>R/ KFK1 1 14 3 4-/ A2 /N &~7
77ie
NORTH CAROLINA
REGISTER
IN THIS ISSUE
EXECUTIVE ORDERS
IN ADDITION
Voting Rights Act
PROPOSED RULES
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Human Resources
COlfa
TITUI
tiomI
RRC OBJECTIONS
CONTESTED CASE DECISIONS
ISSUE DATE: June 1, 1994
Volume 9 • Issue 5 • Plages 306 - 348
INFORMATION ABOUT THE NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER AND ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER
The North Carolina Register is published twice a month and
contains information relating to agency, executive, legislative and
judicial actions required by or affecting Chapter 150B of the General
Statutes. All proposed administrative rules and notices of public
hearings filed under G.S. 1 50B-21 .2 must be published in the Register.
The Register will typically comprise approximately fifty pages per
issue of legal text.
State law requires that a copy of each issue be provided free of
charge to each county in the state and to various state officials and
institutions.
The North Carolina Registers available by yearly subscription at
a cost of one hundred and five dollars ($105.00) for 24 issues.
Individual issues may be purchased for eight dollars ($8.00).
Requests for subscription to the North Carolina Register should be
directed to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P. O. Drawer 27447,
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447.
ADOPTION, AMENDMENT, AND REPEAL OF
RULES
The following is a generalized statement of the procedures to be
followed for an agency to adopt, amend, or repeal a rule. For the
specific statutory authority, please consult Article 2A of Chapter 1 50B
of the General Statutes.
Any agency intending to adopt, amend, or repeal a rule must first
publish notice of the proposed action in the North Carolina Register.
The notice must include the time and place of the public hearing (or
instructions on how a member of the public may request a hearing); a
statement of procedure for public comments; the text of the proposed
rule or the statement of subject matter; the reason for the proposed
action; a reference to the statutory authority for the action and the
proposed effective date.
Unless a specific statute provides otherwise, at least 15 days must
elapse following publication of the notice in the North Carolina
Registerbefovs the agency may conduct the public hearing and at least
30 days must elapse before the agency can take action on the proposed
rule. An agency may not adopt a rule that differs substantially from the
proposed form published as part of the public notice, until the adopted
version has been published in the North Carolina Register for an
additional 30 day comment period.
When final action is taken, the promulgating agency must file the
rule with the Rules Review Commission (RRC). After approval by
RRC, the adopted rule is filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings (OAH).
A rule or amended rule generally becomes effective 5 business
days after the rule is filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings
for publication in the North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC).
Proposed action on rules may be withdrawn by the promulgating
agency at any time before final action is taken by the agency or before
filing with OAH for publication in the NCAC.
TEMPORARY RULES
Under certain emergency conditions, agencies may issue tempo
rary rules. Within 24 hours of submission to OAH, the Codifier o
Rules must review the agency's written statement of findings of neet
for the temporary rule pursuant to the provisions in G.S. 150B-21.1. 1
the Codifier determines that the findings meet the criteria in G.S
150B-21.1, the rule is entered into the NCAC. If the Codifie
determines that the findings do not meet the criteria, the rule is returnee
to the agency. The agency may supplement its findings and resubmi
the temporary rule for an additional review or the agency may respon
that it will remain with its initial position. The Codifier, thereafter, wil
enter the rule into the NCAC. A temporary rule becomes effectiv
either when the Codifier of Rules enters the rule in the Code or on th
sixth business day after the agency resubmits the rule without change
The temporary rule is in effect for the period specified in the rule or 18(
days, whichever is less. An agency adopting a temporary rule mus
begin rule-making procedures on the permanent rule at the same tim
the temporary rule is filed with the Codifier.
NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
The North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC) is a compilatio
and index of the administrative rules of 25 state agencies and 3
occupational licensing boards. The NCAC comprises approximatel
15,000 letter size, single spaced pages of material of which approxi
mately 35% is changed annually. Compilation and publication of th
NCAC is mandated by G.S. 150B-21.18.
The Code is divided into Titles and Chapters. Each state agency i
assigned a separate title which is further broken down by chapter;
Title 21 is designated for occupational licensing boards.
The NCAC is available in two formats.
(1) Single pages may be obtained at a minimum cost of tw
dollars and 50 cents ($2.50) for 10 pages or less, plus fiftee
cents ($0.15) per each additional page.
(2) The full publication consists of 53 volumes, totaling i
excess of 15,000 pages. It is supplemented monthly wit
replacement pages. A one year subscription to the fu
publication including supplements can be purchased fo
seven hundred and fifty dollars ($750.00). Individual vol
umes may also be purchased with supplement service. Re
newal subscriptions for supplements to the initial publicatio
are available.
Requests for pages of rules or volumes of the NCAC should b
directed to the Office of Administrative Hearings.
CITATION TO THE NORTH CAROLINA
REGISTER
The North Carolina Register is cited by volume, issue, pag
number and date. 1:1 NCR 101-201, April 1, 1986 refers to Volum
1, Issue 1, pages 101 through 201 of the North Carolina Registerissae
on April 1, 1986.
FOR INFORMATION CONTACT: Office of Administra-
tive Hearings, ATTN: Rules Division, P.O. Drawer 27447,
Raleigh, North Carolina 2761 1-7447, (919) 733-2678.
NORTH
CAROLINA
REGISTER
Office of Administrative Hearings
P. O. Drawer 27447
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7447
(919) 733-2678
Julian Mann III,
Director
James R. Scarcella Sr.,
Deputy Director
Molly Masich,
Director ofAPA Services
Staff:
Ruby Creech,
Publications Coordinator
Teresa Kilpatrick,
Editorial Assistant
Jean Shirley,
Editorial Assistant
This publication is printed on permanent,
acid-free paper in compliance with
G.S. 125-11.13.
ISSUE CONTENTS
I. EXECUTIVE ORDERS
Executive Orders 46-48
n. IN ADDITION
Voting Rights Act
306
312
HI. PROPOSED RULES
Environment, Health, and
Natural Resources
Health Services ........... 323
Human Resources
Medical Assistance ......... 318
Mental Health, Developmental
Disabilities and Substance Abuse
Services 313
IV. RRC OBJECTIONS 325
V. CONTESTED CASE DECISIONS
Index to ALJ Decisions 328
Text of Selected Decisions
92 OSP 1454 333
93 OSP 0925 342
VI. CUMULATIVE INDEX ....... 347
NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER
Publication Schedule
(April 1994 - January 1995)
Volume
and
Issue
Number
Issue
Date
Last Day
for
Filing
Last Day
for Elec-
tronic
Filing
Earliest
Date for
Public
Hearing
15 days
from
notice
* End of
Required
Comment
Period
30 days
from
notice
Last Day
to Submit
toRRC
** Earliest
EflFective
Date
9:1
04/04/94
03/11/94
03/18/94
04/19/94
05/04/94
05/20/94
07/01/94
9:2
04/15/94
03/24/94
03/31/94
05/02/94
05/16/94
05/20/94
07/01/94
9:3
05/02/94
04/11/94
04/18/94
05/17/94
06/01/94
06/20/94
08/01/94
9:4
05/16/94
04/25/94
05/02/94
05/31/94
06/15/94
06/20/94
08/01/94
9:5
06/01/94
05/10/94
05/17/94
06/16/94
07/01/94
07/20/94
09/01/94
9:6
06/15/94
05/24/94
06/01/94
06/30/94
07/15/94
07/20/94
09/01/94
9:7
07/01/94
06/10/94
06/17/94
07/18/94
08/01/94
08/22/94
10/01/94
9:8
07/15/94
06/23/94
06/30/94
08/01/94
08/15/94
08/22/94
10/01/94
9:9
08/01/94
07/11/94
07/18/94
08/16/94
08/31/94
09/20/94
11/01/94
9:10
08/15/94
07/25/94
08/01/94
08/30/94
09/14/94
09/20/94
11/01/94
9:11
09/01/94
08/11/94
08/18/94
09/16/94
10/03/94
10/20/94
12/01/94
9:12
09/15/94
08/24/94
08/31/94
09/30/94
10/17/94
10/20/94
12/01/94
9:13
10/03/94
09/12/94
09/19/94
10/18/94
11/02/94
11/21/94
01/01/95
9:14
10/14/94
09/23/94
09/30/94
10/31/94
11/14/94
11/21/94
01/01/95
9:15
11/01/94
10/11/94
10/18/94
11/16/94
12/01/94
12/20/94
02/01/95
9:16
11/15/94
10/24/94
10/31/94
1 1/30/94
12/15/94
12/20/94
02/01/95
9:17
12/01/94
11/07/94
11/15/94
12/16/94
01/03/95
01/20/95
03/01/95
9:18
12/15/94
11/22/94
12/01/94
12/30/94
01/17/95
01/20/95
03/01/95
9:19
01/03/95
12/08/94
12/15/94
01/18/95
02/02/95
02/20/95
04/01/95
9:20
01/17/95
12/21/94
12/30/94
02/01/95
02/16/95
02/20/95
04/01/95
This table is published as a public service, and the computation of time periods are not to be deemed binding
or controlling, lime is computed according to 26 NCAC 2B .0103 and the Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule
6.
* An agency must accept comments for at least 30 days after the proposed text is published or until the date
of any public hearing, whichever is longer. See G.S. 150B-2 1.2(f) for adoption procedures.
** The "Earliest Effective Date " is computed assuming that the agency follows the publication schedule above,
that the Rules Review Commission approves the rule at the next calendar month meeting after submission, and
that RRC delivers the rule to the Codifier of Rules five (5) business days before the 1st business day of the next
calendar month.
Revised 03194
EXECUTIVE ORDERS
EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 46
COMMISSION ON SUBSTANCE ABUSE
TREATMENT AND PREVENTION
By the authority vested in me as Governor by the
Constitution and laws of North Carolina, IT IS
ORDERED:
Section 1. Establishment and Membership.
(a) There is hereby established a Commission on
Substance Abuse Treatment and Prevention
("Commission") and an Office of Substance Abuse
Policy ("Office").
(b) The Commission shall consist of twenty
persons appointed by the Governor. The Governor
shall designate the Chair of the Commission. All
Commission members shall serve at the pleasure of
the Governor.
(c) Members shall be citizens, government
officials and representatives of nonprofit organiza-
tions who have demonstrated interest, involvement,
or expertise in issues related to prevention, inter-
vention, and treatment of alcohol and other drug
abuse.
(d) For the initial appointment period, ten of the
members shall serve two-year terms and ten
members shall serve four-year terms. At the
expiration of these terms, subsequent member
appointments shall be for four-year terms.
(e) The Commission shall meet regularly at the
call of the Chair.
Section 2. Functions.
In fulfilling its responsibilities, the Commission
shall have the following duties:
(a) Engender cooperation and collaboration
among agencies, public and private,
involved in drug and alcohol abuse pro-
grams;
(b) Review the North Carolina laws regard-
ing substance abuse, including criminal
and service-delivery statutes, and make
recommendations concerning needed
changes;
(c) Review and recommend mechanisms for
the coordination of state and local re-
sources for addressing identified needs;
(d) Conduct public hearings and advise the
Governor and other appropriate state
government departments and agency
heads of the result and recommendations
of the Commission;
(e) Encourage local boards, councils, or
commissions to mobilize resources to
address substance abuse problems;
(f) Encourage local boards, councils, or
commissions to develop an implementa-
tion plan to meet identified needs;
(g) Assist local boards, councils, or commis-
sions in identifying model prevention,
intervention, and treatment efforts;
(h) Encourage program activities that in-
crease public awareness of substance
abuse and strategies to decrease the prob-
lem; and
(i) Other duties as assigned by the Governor
and/or Secretary of the Department of
Administration.
Section 3. Administration.
(a) The heads of all State departments and
agencies shall, to the extent permitted by law,
provide the Commission and the Office with
information they require to achieve the purposes of
this Order.
(b) The Office shall hire such staff as may be
necessary to help the Commission accomplish its
goals, contingent upon the availability of funds.
(c) Members of the Commission shall serve
without compensation, but may receive reimburse-
ment contingent on the availability of funds for
travel and subsistence expenses in accordance with
state guidelines and procedures.
(d) The Commission and the Office shall be
funded by the Governor's discretionary funds and
from agencies who have primary responsibility for
involvement in program issues affecting drugs and
alcohol. For administrative purposes, the Com-
mission and the Office shall be housed in the
Department of Administration. Oversight shall be
with the Governor's Policy Office.
Section 4. Reports.
(a) Every department, agency, institution, and
organization subject to the Executive Budget Act
(Chapter 143 of the General Statutes), and a direct
or indirect recipient of state or federal substance
abuse funding, shall report specific program and
fiscal information semi-annually to the Office, in
a report format approved by that office and the
Office of State Budget and Management.
(b) These reports shall, at least, include a report
of all revenues and expenditures for the period. In
addition, each report shall contain expenditure
activity against explicit substance abuse program
performance measures determined by the depart-
ment, agency, institution, or organization consis-
tent with nomenclature and procedures for perfor-
mance-based budgeting established by the Office of
State Budget and Management.
9:5
NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER
June 1, 1994
306
EXECUTIVE ORDERS
(c) The Commission and the Office shall report
their findings and recommendations to the
Governor.
Section 5. Rescission.
Executive Orders 23, 64, and 132 of the Martin
Administration are hereby rescinded.
This Executive Order is effective this the 27th
day of April, 1994.
EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 47
BOARD OF EDUCATION FOR
THE SCHOOLS FOR THE DEAF
By the power vested in me as Governor by the
laws and Constitution of the State of North
Carolina, IT IS ORDERED:
Section L Establishment and Purpose.
There is hereby created the Board of Education
for the Schools for the Deaf ("Board"). Its
purpose shall be to provide direction and guidance
to the North Carolina Schools for the Deaf
("Schools") and the Department of Human
Resources ("DHR").
Section 2. Membership and Terms.
The Board shall consist of 12 voting members
appointed by the Governor as follows:
(A) Three members shall be parents of
students that have attended the North
Carolina Schools for the Deaf, with each
of the three Schools represented;
(B) Three members shall be at-large
representatives;
(C) Three members shall be educators with
training in deaf education and awareness
of current deaf issues and needs;
(D) Two members of the business community
who have vocational placement expertise;
and
(E) One member who is a past attendee of
one of the Schools or a member of the
North Carolina Association of the Deaf.
(F) In addition, three students, one from each
of the Schools, shall serve as non-voting
advisors.
Three members shall be designated to serve
initial terms of four years, three to serve initial
terms of three years, three to serve initial terms of
two years and three members to serve initial terms
of one year. After the initial appointees' terms
have expired, all members shall be appointed for
a term of four years. No member appointed by
the Governor shall serve more than two successive
terms.
To the extent possible, each member should have
a background or interest in deaf children and their
educational needs. Any appointment to fill a
vacancy on the Board created by the resignation,
dismissal, death, or disability of a member shall be
for the balance of the unexpired term.
The Chair of the Board shall be designated by
the Secretary of the DHR from among the Board
members and shall hold this office for a two-year
term. The Chair may be reappointed for addition-
al terms.
Section 3. Meetings and Administration.
(A) The Board shall meet quarterly and at other
times at the call of the Chair. A simple majority
of the Board shall constitute a quorum. An affir-
mative vote of a majority of the Board shall be
required to take action.
(B) Board members shall be reimbursed by
DHR for subsistence and travel expenses in accor-
dance with N.C.G.S. 138-5 or 138-6.
(C) DHR shall provide clerical and other admin-
istrative assistance to the Board.
(D) The Chair shall mail a copy of each Board
meeting agenda to the Chair of the Council for the
Deaf and Hard of Hearing (set up in N.C.G.S.
143B-216.31) ten days prior to the meeting.
Section 4. Duties.
(A) Evaluate and recommend changes to the
Secretary of DHR on academic, curriculum,
facility and budgetary matters in the Schools.
(B) Work to ensure equal access to a free,
appropriate public education for all deaf children
at the Schools.
(C) Review program development and consisten-
cy toward the goal of 24-hour quality educational,
vocational, and residential programs at the
Schools.
(D) Formulate and recommend to the Secretary
of DHR policies, procedures, and quality assur-
ance methods to achieve that goal.
(E) Interface with the Council for the Deaf and
Hard of Hearing on issues of mutual interest.
This Order is effective immediately and shall
terminate in four years, unless extended by further
executive order.
Done in the Capital City of Raleigh, North
Carolina, this the 10th day of May, 1994.
307
9:5
NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER
June 1, 1994
EXECUTIVE ORDERS
EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 48
CONCERNING THE STATE
COMMISSION ON NATIONAL AND
COMMUNITY SERVICE
WHEREAS, the increasing realization of the
importance of volunteerism and civic participation,
the growing recognition of community service as
a means of community and state problem-solving,
and the revival of national service as an avenue for
addressing many of the country's unmet social,
environmental, educational, and public safety
needs have revealed new options for enhancing the
quality of life for North Carolinians; and
WHEREAS, promoting the capability of North
Carolina's people, communities, and enterprises to
work collaboratively is vital to the long-term
prosperity of this state; and
WHEREAS, building and encouraging communi-
ty service as an integral part of the formula to our
growth as a state and as a nation requires coopera-
tive efforts by the public sector, the private sector,
the nonprofit sector, and partnerships among these
sectors; and
WHEREAS, a State Commission is necessary to
advise and assist in the development of a compre-
hensive, statewide service plan for promoting
volunteer involvement and citizen participation in
North Carolina;
NOW, THEREFORE, by the authority vested in
me as Governor by the Constitution and laws of
North Carolina, IT IS ORDERED:
Section L Establishment.
The State Commission on National and Commu-
nity Service ("Commission") is hereby established
to encourage community service and volunteer
participation as a means of community and state
problem-solving; to promote and support voluntary
citizen involvement in government and private
programs throughout the state; to develop a long-
term, comprehensive vision and plan of action for
community service initiatives in North Carolina;
and to serve as the state's liaison to national and
state organizations which support its mission.
Section 2. Membership.
A. All members of the Commission shall be
appointed by the Governor. It shall consist of no
fewer than 15 and no more than 25 members. The
Governor shall appoint four of the Commission
members from the Standing Committee on Youth
Voice. Not more than 50 percent of the Commis-
sion plus one member may be from the same
political party. To the extent possible, it shall be
diverse in race, ethnicity, age, disability, and
gender. Terms shall be for three years and shall
be staggered.
B. The Commission shall include:
(1) An individual with expertise in the educa-
tional, training, and developmental needs
of youth, particularly disadvantaged
youth.
(2) An individual with experience in promot-
ing the involvement of older adults in
service and volunteerism.
(3) A representative of community-based
agencies or community-based organiza-
tions within the State.
(4) The Superintendent of the Department of
Public Instruction, or his designee.
(5) A representative of local governments in
the State.
(6) A representative of local labor organiza-
tions in the State.
(7) A representative of business.
(8) At least four individuals between the ages
of 12 and 25 who are service providers
or recipients in a volunteer or service
program.
(9) A representative of the Corporation for
National and Community Service de-
scribed in Section 122(a) of the United
States Public Law 103-82 ("PL."), as a
non-voting, ex officio member.
C. The Commission may include:
(1) Members selected from among local
educators.
(2) Members selected from among experts in
the delivery of human, educational,
environmental, or public safety services
to communities and persons.
(3) Representatives of Native American
tribes.
(4) Members selected from among out-of-
school youth or other "at-risk" youth.
(5) Representatives of entities that receive
assistance under the Domestic Volunteer
Service Act of 1973 (42 U.S.C. 4950 et
seq.).
D. Not more than 25 percent of the Commission
members may be employees of state government,
though additional state agency representatives may
sit on the Commission as non-voting, ex officio
members.
E. Vacancies among the members shall be filled
9:5
NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER
June 1, 1994
308
EXECUTIVE ORDERS
by the Governor to serve for the remainder of the
unexpired term.
Section 3. Officers.
The Officers of the Commission shall be Chair
and Vice-Chair. All officers shall be elected by
the voting Commission members from among their
ranks and shall serve for a term of one year.
Vacancies in any offices shall be filled with an
election by the Commission for the remainder of
the unexpired term.
a. Chair: It shall be the responsibility of
the Chair to preside at all meetings of the
Commission; to appoint all committee
chairs; to assist all committee chairs in
the planning of committee activities; to
supervise all chairs as to the management
of committee plans; to authorize and
execute the wishes of the board; and to
be an ex officio member of all
committees.
b. Vice- Chair: The Vice-Chair shall assist
the Chair, and, in the absence of the
Chair, perform those duties. The Vice-
Chair shall accept special assignments
from the Chair and perform other duties
as delegated by the Commission.
Section 4. Effect On Other Executive Orders.
The Commission is the successor group to the
Governor's Voluntary Advisory Council, formed
by Martin Administration Executive Order 1 39 and
amended by Executive Order 185. That Council
was disbanded by Executive Order 31, dated
October 1, 1993. This Executive Order replaces
and rescinds Executive Order 31.
Section 5. Standing Committees.
The Standing Committees shall advise and assist
the Commission in carrying out its duties and
responsibilities. Committee chairs shall be
appointed by the Commission Chair from among
Commission members, but the committees 5
members need not be limited to Commission
members. With the exception of the Standing
Committee on Youth Voice, the Commission
Chair, in consultation with the Committee Chairs,
shall name the committees' members. Standing
Committees of the Commission shall include:
a. Youth Voice: The Standing Committee
on Youth Voice shall consist of 24
members between the ages of 12 and 25.
Members shall come from 12 regions of
the state and be diverse in gender, race
and ethnicity, geographic location,
physical ability, and economic and
educational background. Its
responsibilities shall include out-reach to
youth statewide, developing and
recommending policies and programs to
the Commission, training other young
people in the skills necessary to
strengthen community service programs
as well as bringing the perspective of
young people to all Commission
discussions and decisions. For the initial
term, members of the Standing
Committee on Youth Voice will be
named by peer selection. Following the
initial term, 12 Regional Councils (to be
designated by the Commission) will each
name two representatives to the Standing
Committee. The Standing Committee on
Youth Voice shall recommend to the
Governor four members to serve on the
Commission.
b. Volunteer Recognition: The Standing
Committee on Volunteer Recognition
shall assist with the implementation of
Governor's awards relating to exemplary
volunteer service in the State; work with
individual communities to develop local
recognition programs; and explore
additional opportunities to recognize
individuals and organizations addressing
community needs through volunteer
service.
c. Evaluation: The Standing Committee on
Evaluation shall evaluate each program
funded by the Corporation for National
and Community Service (described in the
RL. 103-82) and state organizations
which support the purpose of the
Commission to assure their on-going
quality.
d. Community Collaboration: The Standing
Committee on Community Collaboration
shall promote communication and
information sharing between state and
local private and public initiatives to meet
community needs.
e. Resource Development: The Standing
Committee on Resource Development
shall develop and implement strategies to
secure local, state, and federal resources
to reinforce, expand, and initiate quality
community programs across the state.
f. Training: The Standing Committee on
Training will develop and implement
strategies for training and technical
309
9:5
NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER
June 1, 1994
EXECUTIVE ORDERS
assistance to community service
programs, potential grant applicants and
State Commission-funded programs, as
well as work towards building service
program partnerships statewide,
g. Service Learning: The Standing
Committee on Service Learning will act
as a liaison between the State
Commission, private and public
institutions of higher education and the
Department of Public Instruction to shape
the service learning state plan and
promote service learning in community-
based and school-based programs and
partnerships across the state.
Section 6. Meetings.
The Commission shall meet at least quarterly.
Failure to attend at least 75 percent of called
meetings in any calendar year shall result in
removal from the Commission. A quorum shall
consist of a simple majority of voting members.
Section 7. Duties.
The Commission shall, in the performance of its
tasks and functions:
a. Ensure that its funding decisions meet all
federal and state statutory requirements.
b. Recommend innovative, creative,
statewide service programs to increase
volunteer participation in all age groups
and community-based problem-solving
among diverse participants.
c. Develop and implement a centralized,
organized system of obtaining
information and technical support
concerning volunteerism and community
service recruitment, projects, training
methods, materials, and activities
throughout North Carolina. Share such
information and support upon request.
d. Promote strong interagency collaboration
as an avenue for maximizing resources
and provide that model on the State level.
e. Provide public recognition and support of
individual volunteer efforts and
successful or promising private sector
initiatives and public/private partnerships
of which address community needs.
f. Stimulate increased community awareness
of the impact of volunteer services in
North Carolina.
g. Utilize local, state, and federal resources
to reinforce, expand, and initiate quality
service programs.
h. Assist the Governor's Office of Citizen
Affairs in the planning and implementa-
tion of volunteer programs.
i. Serve as the state's liaison and voice to
appropriate national and state organiza-
tions which support its mission.
j. Prepare a national three-year service plan
for the State which follows state and
federal guidelines.
k. Prepare the financial assistance applica-
tions of the State under Sections 1 1 7B
and 1301 of the PL. 103-82.
1. Assist in the preparation of the applica-
tion of the North Carolina Department of
Public Instruction for assistance under
Section 113 of the PL. 103-82.
m. Prepare the State's application under
Section 130 for the approval of service
positions such as the national service
educational award described in Subtitle D
of the PL. 103-82.
n. Make technical assistance available to
enable applicants for assistance under
Section 121 to plan and implement ser-
vice programs; and to apply for assis-
tance under the federal service laws such
as the PL. 103-82.
o. Assist in the provision of health care and
child care benefits under Section 140 to
participants in national service programs
that receive assistance under Section 121
of the PL. 103-82.
p. Develop a state system for the recruit-
ment and placement of participants in
programs that receive assistance under
the national service laws and disseminate
information concerning national service
programs that receive such assistance or
approved national service positions.
q. Administer the State's grant program in
support of national service programs
(using assistance provided to the State
under Section 121 of the PL. 103-82)
including selection, oversight, and evalu-
ation of grant recipients.
r. Coordinate its functions (including re-
cruitment, public awareness, and training
activities) with any division of the federal
ACTION program or the Corporation for
National and Community Services out-
lined in the PL. 103-82.
Section 8. Administration and Expenses.
The Governor's Office of Citizen Affairs shall
provide necessary administrative and staff support
9:5
NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER
June 1, 1994
310
EXECUTIVE ORDERS
services to the Commission. The Commission is
authorized to accept funds and in-kind services
from other state and federal entities, as authorized
by the North Carolina Executive Budget Act. No
per diem allowance shall be paid to members of
the Commission. Members of the Commission
and staff may receive necessary travel and subsis-
tence expenses in accordance with state law.
These expenses shall be paid from federal funds
where possible. If federal funds are not available,
these expenses may be paid only if the Governor's
Office has sufficient funds.
This Order is effective immediately.
Done in Raleigh, North Carolina, this the 12th
day of May, 1994.
311 9:5 NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER June 1, 1994
IN ADDITION
Ihis Section contains public notices that are required to be published in the Register or have been
approved by the Codifier of Rules for publication
U.S. Department of Justice
Civil Rights Division
DLP:MAP:MJP:emr Voting Section
DJ 166-012-3 P.O. Box 66128
94-0856 Washington, DC. 20035-6128
April 26, 1994
Robert C. Cogswell, Jr., Esq.
City Attorney
P. O. Box 1513
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28302-1513
Dear Mr. Cogswell:
This refers to the procedures for conducting the May 3, 1994, special bond election for the City of
Fayetteville in Cumberland County, North Carolina, submitted to the Attorney General pursuant to Section
5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 1973c. We received your submission on
February 28, 1994.
The Attorney General does not interpose any objection to the specified change. However, we note
that Section 5 expressly provides that the failure of the Attorney General to object does not bar subsequent
litigation to enjoin the enforcement of the change. See the Procedures for the Administration of Section 5 (28
C.F.R. 51.41).
Sincerely,
Deval L. Patrick
Assistant Attorney General
Civil Rights Division
By:
Steven H. Rosenbaum
Chief, Voting Section
9:5 NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER June 1, 1994 312
PROPOSED RULES
TITLE 10 - DEPARTMENT OF
HUMAN RESOURCES
ISotice is hereby given in accordance with G.S.
150B-21.2that the Commission for Mental Health,
Developmental Disabilities and Substance Abuse
Services intends to amend rules cited as 10 NCAC
18F .0312 - .0313, .0318 - .0319; and adopt rules
cited as 10 NCAC 18F .0321 - .0322, with chang-
es from the proposed text noticed in the Register .
Volume 9, Issue 1, pages 13-23.
1 he proposed effective date of this action is
September 1, 1994.
IVeason for Proposed Action: To provide public
notice of substantive changes made at the May 10,
1994 public hearing regarding conducting and
reporting DWI assessments.
Ksomment Procedures: Written comments may be
submitted to Charlotte Tucker, Division of Mental
Health, Developmental Disabilities and Substance
Abuse Services, Albemarle Building, 325 N.
Salisbury Street, Raleigh, N.C. 27603. These
comments will be accepted from June 1 , 1994
through July 1, 1994.
rLditor's Note: An agency may not adopt a rule
that differs substantially from the text of a pro-
posed rule published in the Register, unless the
agency publishes the text of the proposed differ-
ent rule and accepts comments on the new text
for at least 30 days after the publication of the
new text.
CHAPTER 18 - MENTAL HEALTH:
OTHER PROGRAMS
SUBCHAPTER 18F - PROGRAM SUPPORT
STANDARDS
SECTION .0300 - SUBSTANCE ABUSE
ASSESSMENTS FOR INDIVIDUALS
CHARGED WITH OR CONVICTED OF
DRIVING WHILE IMPALED (DWI)
.0312 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
Th e purpoo e of th e rules of thio S e ction is to
ootnbliah s p e cific proo e dur e e for oonduoting and
reporting DWI substance abuse aflsoosmonto. Suoh
asBeflBm e ntfl may b e sought e ith e r voluntarily on a
pro trial basi s or by order of the preoiding judg e
These rules apply to any facility lioonood by the
State as an alcoholi s m and substance abuse treat -
ment facility or a facility which provides aubotancc
abuse services and is excluded from licensure
under G.S. — 122C 22 which wishes to perform
DWI substance abuse assessments.
(a) The purpose of the rules of this Section is to
establish specific procedures for conducting and
reporting DWI substance abuse assessments-
Alcohol and Drug Education Traffic Schools
(ADETS). and treatment of DWI offenders.
(b) Assessments may be sought either voluntari-
ly on a pre-trial basis or by order of the presiding
judge.
(c) These Rules app ly to any facility that con-
ducts DWI assessments.
(d) In order for a facility to perform DWI
assessments, it shall:
(1) be licensed by the State as an alcohol
ism and substance abuse treatment
facility: or
(2) provide substance abuse services, and
be excluded from licensure under G.S
122C-22.
Statutory Authority G.S. 20-1 79(e)(6) and (m).
.0313 DEFINITIONS
For the purpose of the rules in this Section, the
following terms shall have the meanings indicated:
w-
' Alcohol and Drug — Education Traffic
School (ADETS)" means a prevention
and intervention service which provides
an educational program primarily for fir s t
offender s — convicted — e£ — driving — while
impaired. — Thi s s ervice i s designed to
reduce the recidivism rate for the offen s e
in
of driving while impaired.
"American Society of Addiction Medicine
(ASAM) Placement Criteria" means the
Patient Placement Criteria for the Treat-
ment of Psychoactive Substance Abuse
Disorders, copyright 1991 by the Nation-
al Association of Addiction Treatment
Providers and the American Society of
Addiction Medicine. For these Rules.
the ASAM Level L Outpatient Treat-
ment, has been divided into I.A.. Short-
0)
term and I.B.. Longer-term Outpatient
Treatment.
"Certified ADETS Instructor" means an
individual who is certified by the Divi-
sion in accordance with 10 NCAC 18M
.0906 Instructor Certification, contained
313
9:5
NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER
June 1, 1994
PROPOSED RULES
in Division publication. Standards for
Area Programs and Their Contract Agen-
cies, APSM 35-1, and available at the
current printing cost.
(3) £3) "Clinical Interview" means the face-
to-face interview with a substance abuse
professional intended to gather informa-
tion on the client, including, but not
limited to the following: demographics,
medical history, past and present driving
offense record, alcohol concentration of
current offense, social and family history,
substance abuse history, vocational back-
ground and mental status.
(4) "Continuing Care" means an out patient
service designed to maximize the recov-
ery experience begun in more intensive
treatment: out patient or inpatient. As a
continuation of the treatment experience
this service is expected to begin immedi-
ately upon the client's discharge from
intensive treatment:
(a) When the continuing care follows an
inpatient treatment experience, it shall:
(i) include a minimum of 20 contact
hours of service scheduled no less
than weekly, during a 30-day period:
and
(ii) continue for a minimum period of 90
days.
(b) The services shall be provided accord-
ing to a written continuing care plan
which shall:
(i) address the needs of the client: and
(ii) utilize individual, family and group
counseling as required to meet the
needs of the client.
(5) "Division" means the same as defined in
G.S. 122C-3: and is hereafter referred to
as DMH/DD/SAS.
0) £6) "DMH Form 508 (DWI Services
Certificate of Completion)" means the
four-part form which is used in docu-
menting the offenders completion of the
DWI substance abuse assessment and
treatment or ADETS and compliance or
non compliance of ADETS as appropri
ftt©.
CD "Driving record" means a person's com-
plete North Carolina driving history, as
maintained by the North Carolina
Driver's License Division's history file.
(8) "DSM" means the current edition of the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Disorders of the American
Psychiatric Association.
(4) £9) "DWI" means impaired driving as
described in G.S. 20-138.1.
(10) "DWI categories of service" mean:
(a) "Alcohol and Drug Education Traffic
School (ADETS)" means an a pproved
curriculum which shall:
£i} include K) to J_3 contact hours in a
classroom setting:
(ii) be provided by area programs or their
designated agencies with certified
ADETS instructors: and
(iii) be designed for persons:
(A) who have only
one
DWI
conviction (lifetime):
(B) whose assessment did not identify
a "Substance Abuse Handicap":
and
(C) whose alcohol concentration was
.14 or less.
(b) "Day treatment" means a structured,
outpatient service. It may also be
called intensive outpatient treatment, as
defined in K) NCAC 14N .0900 and
a pplicable portions of K) NCAC 14K
.0300. which include ASAM Level II
treatment criteria.
(c) "Inpatient residential treatment
services" means an array of services
which may include detoxification and
rehabilitation in a structured
environment, as set forth in K> NCAC
14Q .0300. and contained in Licensure
Rules as defined in Item (14) of this
Rule. Such services will correspond
with ASAM Level III and Level IV
treatment criteria.
(d) "Longer-term outpatient treatment"
means a structured program meeting the
ASAM definition of Level L Outpatient
Treatment, and requiring a minimum of
40 contact hours scheduled to maintain
the client in active treatment for a
minimum period of 60 days, providing
counseling and learning experiences
which include the "Minimal Subject
Content. " as defined in this Rule. The
facility must operate in compliance with
Licensure Rules. 10 NCAC 14N .0700
and applicable portions of K) NCAC
14K .0300.
(e) "Short-term outpatient treatment" means
a structured program meeting the broad
definition of "ASAM Level L
Outpatient Treatment." and requiring a
9:5
NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER
June 1, 1994
314
PROPOSED RULES
I
minimum of 20 contact hours over a
period of at least 30 days, including
counseling and didactic experiences
which include the minimal subject
content. Facilities which are a pproved
to provide this shall operate in
compliance with Licensure Rules
contained in 10 NCAC 14N .0700 and
a pplicable portions of K) NCAC 14K
.0300.
(S) OJi "DWI Substance Abuse
Assessment" means a service provided to
persons charged with or convicted of
DWI to determine the presence or
absence of a substance abuse handicap.
The assessment involves a clinical
interview as well as the use of a
standardized test.
{€) (12) "Facility" means the term as
defined in G.S. 122C-3(14).
(13) "Licensure rules" mean the rules
contained in 10 NCAC 14K through 14Q
of the North Carolina Administrative
Code and published in Division publica-
tion. Licensure Rules for MH/DD/SA
Facilities, APSM 40-2.
(14) "Minimal subject content" means the
following list of subjects which shall be
addressed in the educational portion of
any treatment program serving DWI
offenders:
(a) Effects of Alcohol and Drugs on the
Body/Brain;
(b) The Nature of Denial;
(c) Disease Concept of Chemical Depen-
dency;
(d) Progression of Disease and Recovery
(Jellinek Chart);
(e) Chemical Dependency and the Family;
(f) Introduction to Self- Help Groups/ 12
Step Recovery Programs;
(g) Relapse Prevention and Strategies for
Recovery; and
(h) Safe Roads Act Penalties.
(15) "Special service plan" means a plan for
persons who exhibit unusual circumstanc-
es, such as severe hearing impairment,
other physical disabilities, concurrent
psychiatric illness, language and commu-
nication problems, intractable problems
of distance, transportation and schedul-
ing, and chronic offenders with multiple
unsuccessful treatment experiences.
(9) (16) "Standardized Test" means an
instrument a written test approved by the
Department of Human Resources, with
documented reliability and validity,
which serves to assist the assessment
agency or individual in determining if the
client has a substance abuse handicap. A
current listing of the approved standard-
ized tests may be obtained by writing the
DWI/Criminal Justice Branch, Division
of Mental Health, Mental Retardation and
Substance Abu s e Services MH/DD/SAS,
m
325 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh. NC
27603 33644.
(17) "Substance Abuse Handicap" means
a degree of dysfunction directly related to
the recurring use/abuse of an impairing
substance.
Statutory Authority G.S. 20-138.1; 20-179; 122C-
3.
.0318 RESPONSIBILnTES OF TREATMENT
OR ADETS PROVIDERS
(a) An individual shall be provided with docu-
mentation that outlines their obligation, resulting
from the assessment recommendations. A written
plan shall be developed by the facility providing
the recommended treatment or ADETS to insure
that the individual understand s the requirements of
the particular treatment or education service in
which they arc enrolled.
(b) Individual s shall not be denied the opportuni -
ty to complete the service recommended by the
assessing agency. An individual who does not
begin services within nine months of the date of
the initial assessment shall be re-evaluated utilizing
the results of the initial assessment.
(c) The facility providing the recommended
treatment or ADETS shall have the individual
execute the appropriate release of information
giving that facility permission to report the client's
progress to the^ Divi s ion of Mental Health, Mental
Retardation, and Substance Abuse Services, the
Divi s ion of Motor Vehicles, the Court and the
Department of Correction.
LO DMH/DD/SAS;
(2) Division of Motor Vehicles;
£3} Court;
(4) Department of Correction: and
(5) assessing and treatment agencies, as
a ppropriate.
(d) Identification of a substance abuse handicap
shall be considered indicative of the need for
treatment^ when diagnostic criteria a pply . In such
instances, educationally-oriented and/or support
group services shall only be provided as a supple-
315
9:5
NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER
June 1, 1994
PROPOSED RULES
ment to a more extensive treatment plan.
(e) If treatment is recommended and required
per the court's judgement, such treatment shall be
provided by a facility licensed by the state State
for the provision of such services. In addition, a
client record shall be opened en for each client
receiving treatment.
Statutory Authority G.S.
143B-147.
20-1 79(m); 122C-26;
.0319 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
(a) The assessment portion of the DMH Form
508 shall be completed en for each client who
receives a DWI substance abuse assessment. An
initial supply of this form may be obtained from
the DWI/Criminal Justice Branch of the Divi s ion
ef DMH/DD/SAS Mental — Health, — Mental
Retardation, and Sub s tance Abuse Services , 325
N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, N.C. 27603 37644.
(b) The assessment portion of DMH Form 508
shall be signed by a certified alcoholism, drug
abu s e or substance abuse counselor. The date of
expiration of that professional's certification shall
be indicated on the client's Certificate of
Completion and no assessment shall be signed after
the expiration date .
(c) The facility providing the recommended
treatment or education shall have the client sign
the a ppropriate release of information, and
progress reports shall be filed with the court or the
Department of Correction at intervals not to
exceed six months. If treatment, education or both
i s recommended, all four
pages
of the DMH Form
508 shall bo forwarded to the faoility providing the
recommended treatment or education.
(d) In the event that — ee — s ubstance — abu s e
handicap — is — identified — and — ne — treatment — ef
education — recommendations — afe — made, — the
assessing agency s hall forward the copie s of DMH
Form 50 8 as specified in part (g) of thi s Rule.
Upon completion of the recommended treatment or
ADETS service, the agency shall:
(1) forward the top page of the completed
DMH Form 508 to the DWI/Criminal
Justice Branch. DMH/DD/SAS: and
(2) retain, for a period of at least five
years, the appropriate page of the form,
and distribute the remaining pages to
the offender and the court as specified
on the bottom of the form.
(e) In the event that an assessment or treatment
agency ceases to provide DWI-related services, the
agency shall notify, in writing, the DWI Criminal
Justice Branch to assure that all DMH Form 508s
and other related documents specified in G.S. 20-
179(m) are properly processed. The facility
providing the recommended treatment or education
shall have the client s ign the appropriate release of
information, and progre s s reports s hall be filed
with the court or the Department of Correction at
interval s not to exceed six months.
(f) If treatment and ADETS have been court
order e d, and the individual does not successfully
complete the requirements of the ADETS, a copy
of the top s heet of DMH Form 50 8 showing non
compliance — s hall — be — forwarded — te — the
DWI/Criminal Ju s tice Branch, Division of Mental
Health, Mental Retardation, and Substance Abuse
Service s . — All four pages of the DMH Form 5 08
s hall be retained by the faoility providing the
recommended treatment s ervice until such s ervice
arc completed. By February 15 of each year, all
assessing agencies shall forward, in writing, to the
DWI/Criminal Justice Branch of the Division the
following information on the previous year's
activities, which shall include but need not be
limited to the number of:
(1) pre-trial assessments conducted;
(2) post trial assessments conducted:
(3) individuals referred to ADETS: and
(4) substance abuse handicaps identified
and the recommended levels of
treatment.
fg) Upon completion of the recommended
treatment or education service, the top page of the
completed DMH Form 50 8 shall be forwarded to
the DWI/Criminal Justice Branch, the Divi s ion of
Mental Health, Mental Retardation , and Substance
Abuse Services. — The
s hall al s o retain the
agency
appropriate page of the form and distribute the
remaining page s to the offender and the court aa
s pecified on the bottom of the form -: — The agency
providing the servicc( s ) shall retain its copy of this
form for a period of not loss than five years.
(h) In the event that an assessment or treatment
agency ceases providing DWI related services, it
shall be the re s pon s ibility of that agency to notify
the DWI Criminal Justice Branch in writing to
assure that all DMH Form 50 8 forms and other
related documents s pecified in G.S. 20 179(m) are
properly processed.
Statutory Authority G.S. 20-1 79(m).
.0321 PLACEMENT CRITERIA FOR
ASSESSED DWI CLIENTS
(a) Clients who have undergone a
DWI
substance abuse assessment shall be placed in the
a ppropriate DWI category of service.
9:5
NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER
June 1, 1994
316
PROPOSED RULES
(b) Placement of clients in a specific category
shall be based on the assessment outcome,
diagnosis, and level of care determined to be
necessary for treatment.
(c) In addition to the terms defined in Rule
.0313(10) of this Section for each of the following
progressive categories, determination for
placement shall be based on the criteria specified
in this Paragraph.
£1} ADETS:
(A) the assessment did not identify a
"Substance Abuse Handicap;
(B) the person has no previous DWI
conviction; and
(C) the person had an alcohol
concentration of 0.14% or less at the
time of arrest.
(2) Short-term Outpatient Treatment:
(A) the assessment outcome suggests
diagnosis of psychoactive substance
abuse only;
(B) the client does not fit all aspects of
the diagnosis, but, under certain
circumstances, the clinical picture
provides reason to conclude that a
treatment setting would be more
a ppropriate than ADETS. Some of
these circumstances include, but are
not limited to:
alcohol concentration is .15 or
higher;
ill
m
m
(hi
refusal of breath test at time of
arrest:
problems relating to family
history;
other problems which seem to be
a contributing factor to DWI
behavior; such as grief, loss, etc.:
and
(v) the client meets the criteria for
Level I of the ASAM Placement
Criteria.
(C) the person had an alcohol
concentration of 0.14% or less at the
time of arrest.
01
(M
Longer-term Outpatient Treatment:
when a client meets minimal
conditions for the diagnosis of
"psychoactive substance dependence; "
and
(B) the criteria for Level I of the ASAM
placement is met.
(4) Day Treatment:
(A) the assessment confirms a diagnosis of
psychoactive substance dependence.
moderate or severe:
(B) the ASAM placement criteria for
Level II Outpatient Treatment is met:
(C) program:
{i} includes an educational component
which addresses at least the
minimal subject content, as
defined in Rule .0313 of this
Section;
(ii) offers additional continuing care-
urging voluntary participation of
the client and significant others:
and
(iii) requires a minimum of 90 contact
hours and participation of the
client over a period of at least 90
days, for any client referred under
G.S. 20-179(m) or (e)(6).
(D) program may be preceded by a brief
inpatient stay for detoxification or
stabilization of a medical or
psychiatric condition.
(5) Inpatient Residential Treatment
Services:
(A) the level of care requires that the
client meets the same diagnostic
criteria as Intensive Outpatient
(dependence is moderate or severe):
(B) outpatient treatment of other
associated problems has not been
successful;
(C) the client meets the placement criteria
for Levels III or IV (Inpatient) of the
ASAM Placement Criteria with regard
to the following six "patient problems
areas" as set forth in ASAM Patient
Placement Criteria. Adult Crosswalk;
and the client exhibits:
(i) withdrawal risk;
(ii) need for medical monitoring;
(iii) emotional and behavioral
problems requiring a structured
setting;
(iv) high resistance to treatment;
(v) inability to abstain; and
(vi) lives in a negative and destructive
environment.
(D) in order for the client to meet the
required 90-day time frame for
treatment, the client, upon discharge,
shall enroll in an approved continuing
care or other outpatient program.
(6) Special Service Plan:
(A) documented need for a special
program to correspond with the
317
9:5
NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER
June 1, 1994
PROPOSED RULES
recommendations of the DWI
assessment, which shall include
documentation:
(i) of the special circumstances which
prove that the client is unable to
participate in or benefit from the
recommended basic structured
program: and
(ii) that the participation would be
detrimental to the client.
(B) Some of the conditions under which a
Special Service Plan is implemented
may include, but need not be limited
to. the following:
(i) severe hearing impairment:
(ii) other physical disabilities:
(iii) concurrent psychiatric illness:
(iv) language and communication
problems:
£v) intractable problems of distance,
transportation and scheduling: and
(vi) chronic offenders with multiple
unsuccessful treatment
experiences.
Statutory Authority G.S. 20- 179(e)(6) and (m).
.0322 DOCUMENTATIONREQUIREMENTS
(a) When conducting the assessment for an
individual charged with, or convicted of, offenses
related to Driving While Impaired (DWI), DMH
Form 508 shall be completed.
(b) If treatment is recommended, client record
documentation shall include, but not be limited to,
the following minimum requirements for each
"DWI category of service" defined in Rule .0313
of this Section, except for the ADETS category:
(1) all items specified in the "clinical
interview. " as defined in Rule .0313 of
this Section:
(2) results of the administration of an
approved "standardized test." as defined
in Rule .0313 of this Section:
(3) release of information as set forth in
Rules .0315 and .0318 of this Section:
and
(4) release of information covering any
collateral contacts, and documentation
of the collateral information.
(c) Substance abuse treatment records shall
comply with the requirements in 10 NCAC 14K
■0315(a) through fgL I1L fkL and in K) NCAC
14K .0317.
Statutory Authority G.S. 20- 179(e) (6) and (m).
******************
Notice is hereby given in accordance with G.S.
150B-21.2 that the DHR/Division of Medical
Assistance intends to amend rules cited as 10
NCAC SOB .0313, .0407 and adopt SOB .0314.
1 he proposed effective date of this action is
September 1, 1994.
1 he public hearing will be conducted at 1:30
p.m. on July 1, 1994 at the North Carolina Divi-
sion of Medical Assistance, 1985 Umstead Drive,
Room 132, Raleigh, NC 27603.
Keason for Proposed Action: Amendment neces-
sary to apply the same methodology and restric-
tions on amount of guardianship fees as applied by
Social Security.
Ksomment Procedures: Written comments con-
cerning these Rules must be submitted by July 1 ,
1994, to: Division of Medical Assistance, 1985
Umstead Drive, Raleigh, NC 27603 ATTN: Clar-
ence Ervin, APA Coordinator. Oral comments
may be presented at the hearing. In addition, a
fiscal impact statement is available upon written
request from the same address.
CHAPTER 50 - MEDICAL ASSISTANCE
SUBCHAPTER 50B - ELIGIBILITY
DETERMINATION
SECTION .0300 - CONDITIONS
FOR ELIGIBILITY
.0313 INCOME
(a) Income from the following sources shall be
counted in the calculation of financial eligibility:
(1) Unearned.
(A) RSDI,
(B) Veteran's Administration,
(C) Railroad Retirement,
(D) Pensions or retirement benefits,
(E) Workmen's Compensation,
(F) Unemployment Compensation,
(G) Support Payments,
(H) Contributions,
(I) Dividends or interest from stocks,
bonds, and other investments,
9:5
NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER
June 1, 1994
318
PROPOSED RULES
(J)
(K)
(L)
(M)
(N)
(O)
(P)
(Q)
(R)
(S)
(T)
(U)
(V)
(W)
(X)
(Y)
(Z)
(2)
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
(E)
(F)
(G)
(H)
(I)
(3)
Trust fund income,
Private disability or employment
compensation,
That portion of educational loans,
grants, and scholarships for mainte-
nance,
Work release,
Lump sum payments,
Military allotments,
Brown Lung Benefits,
Black Lung Benefits,
Trade Adjustment benefits,
SSI when the client is in long term
care,
VA Aid and Attendance when the
client is in long term care,
Foster Care Board payments in excess
of state maximum rates for M-AF
clients who serve as foster parents,
Income allocated from an institutional-
ized spouse to the client who is the
community spouse as stated in 42
U.S.C. 1396r-5(d),
Income allowed from an institutional-
ized spouse to the client who is a
dependent family member as stated in
42 U.S.C. 1396r-5(d),
Sheltered Workshop Income,
Loans if repayment of a loan and not
counted in reserve,
Income deemed to Family and
Children's clients.
Earned Income.
Income from wages, salaries, and
commissions,
Farm Income,
Small business income including
self-employment,
Rental income,
Income from roomers and boarders,
Earned income of a child client who
is a part-time student and a full-time
employee,
Supplemental payments in excess of
state maximum rates for Foster Care
Board payments paid by the county to
Family and Children's clients who
serve as foster parents,
Earned income tax credits for the
Aged, Blind or Disabled only,
VA Aid and Attendance paid to a
budget unit member who provides the
aid and attendance.
Additional sources of income not listed
in (1) or (2) of this Rule will be
considered available unless specifically
excluded by (b) of this Rule, or by
regulation or law.
(b) Income from the following sources shall not
be counted in the calculation of financial
eligibility:
(1) Earned income of a child who is a
part-time student but is not a full-time
employee;
(2) Earned income of a child who is a
full-time student;
(3) Incentive payments and training
allowances made to WIN training
participants;
(4) Payments for supportive services or
reimbursement of out-of-pocket
expenses made to volunteers serving as
VISTA volunteers, foster grandparents,
senior health aides, senior companions,
Service Corps of Retired Executives,
Active Corps of Executives, Retired
Senior Volunteer Programs, Action
Cooperative Volunteer Program,
University Year for Action Program,
and other programs under Titles I, II,
and III of Public Law 93-113;
(5) Foster Care Board payments equal to or
below the state maximum rates for
Family and Children's clients who
serve as foster parents;
(6) Earnings of M-AABD clients who are
participating in ADAP (Adult
Developmental Activity Program)
training programs for a specified
period;
(7) Income that is unpredictable, i.e.,
unplanned and arising only from time to
time. Examples include occasional
yard work, sporadic babysitting, etc.;
(8) Relocation payments;
(9) Value of the coupon allotment under
the Food Stamp Program;
(10) Food (vegetables, dairy products, and
meat) grown by or given to a member
of the household. If home grown
produce is sold, count as earned
income;
(11) Benefits received from the Nutrition
Program for the Elderly;
(12) Food Assistance under the Child
Nutrition Act and National School
Lunch Act;
(13) Assistance provided in cash or in kind
under any governmental, civic, or
charitable organization whose purpose
319
9:5
NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER
June 1, 1994
PROPOSED RULES
is to provide social services or
vocational rehabilitation. This includes
V.R. incentive payments for training,
education and allowance for
dependents, grants for tuition, chore
services under Title XX of the Social
Security Act, VA aid and attendance or
aid to the home bound if the individual
is in a private living arrangement;
(14) Loans or grants such as the GI Bill,
civic, honorary and fraternal club
scholarships, loans, or scholarships
granted from private donations to the
college, etc., except for any portion
used or designated for maintenance;
(15) Loans, grants, or scholarships to
undergraduates for educational purposes
made or insured under any program
administered by the U.S. Department of
Education;
(16) Benefits received under Title VII of the
Older Americans Act of 1965;
(17) Payments received under the
Experimental Housing Allowance
Program (EHAP);
(18) In-kind shelter and utility contributions
paid directly to the supplier. For
Family and Children's cases, shelter,
utilities, or household furnishings made
available to the client at no cost;
(19) Food/clothing contributions in Family
and Children's cases (except for food
allowance for persons temporarily
absent in medical facilities up to 12
months);
(20) Income of a child under 21 in the
budget unit who is participating in
JTPA and is receiving as a child;
(21) Housing Improvement Grants approved
by the N.C. Commission of Indian
Affairs or funds distributed per capital
or held in trust for Indian tribe
members under PL. 92-254, PL.
93-134 or PL. 94-540;
(22) Payments to Indian tribe members as
permitted under PL. 94-114;
(23) Payments made by Medicare to a home
renal dialysis patient as medical
benefits;
(24) SSI except for individuals in long term
care;
(25) HUD Section 8 benefits when paid
directly to the supplier or jointly to the
supplier and client;
(26) Benefits received by a client who is a
representative payee for another
individual who is incompetent or
incapable of handling his affairs. Such
benefits must be accounted for separate
from the payee's own income and
resources;
(27) Special one time payments such as
energy, weatherization assistance, or
disaster assistance that is not designated
as medical;
(28) The value of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture donated foods (surplus
commodities);
(29) Payments under the Alaska Native
Claims Settlement Act, Public Law
92-203;
(30) Any payment received under Title II of
the Uniform Relocation Assistance and
Real Property Acquisition Policies Act
of 1970;
(31) HUD Community Development Block
Grant funds received to finance the
renovation of a privately owned
residence;
(32) Reimbursement for transportation
expenses incurred as a result of
participation in the Community Work
Experience Program or for use of
client's own vehicle to obtain medical
care or treatment;
(33) Adoption assistance;
(34) Incentive payments made to a client
participating in a vocational
rehabilitation program;
(35) Title XX funds received to pay for
services rendered by another individual
or agency;
(36) Any amount received as a refund of
taxes paid;
(37) Any Cost of Living Allowance (COLA)
increase in the RSDI benefit for a
disabled widow or widower resulting
from the 1983 Actuarial Reduction
Formula (ARF) which caused the loss
of SSI effective January, 1984, for an
M-AA, M-AB, or M-AD client:
(A) Who received a disabled widow or
widower's benefit and SSI
simultaneously in 1983 as identified
by the Social Security Administration,
and
(B) Who lost SSI because of the
elimination of the ARF, and
(C) Who is not now eligible for SSI, and
(D) Who was between 50 and 59 years of
9:5
NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER
June 1, 1994
320
PROPOSED RULES
age in 1983, and
(E) Who applied for Medicaid no later
than June 30, 1988, and
(F) Who is classified as Categorically
Needy;
(38) Any Cost of Living Allowance (COLA)
increase in the RSDI benefit for a client
or his financially responsible spouse or
parent(s), who:
(A) Is classified as Categorically Needy
for the M-AA, M-AB, or M-AD
programs, and
(B) Lost SSI or State/County Special
Assistance (S/C-SA) for any reason,
and
(C) Would currently be eligible for SSI or
S/C-SA if all COLA's since he was
last eligible for and received RSDI
and SSI or S/C-SA concurrently were
disregarded;
(39) The RSDI benefit for a client who:
(A) Is a disabled widow or widower or
surviving divorced spouse, and
(B) Received SSI for the month prior to
the month he began receiving RSDI,
and
(C) Would continue to be eligible for SSI
if the RSDI benefit were not counted,
and
(D) Is not entitled to a Medicare Part A.
(40) Earnings of aged, blind and disabled
individuals who have a plan for achiev-
ing self-support (PASS) that is ap-
proved by the Social Security Adminis-
tration.
(c) Income levels for purpo s e purposes of
establishing financial eligibility are those amount
amounts approved by the N.C. General Assembly
and stated in the Appropriations Act for categori-
cally needy and medically needy classifications,
except for the following:
(1) The income level shall be reduced by
one-third when an aged, blind or dis-
abled individual lives in the household
of another person and does not pay his
proportionate share of household ex-
penses. The one-third reduction shall
not apply to children under nineteen
years of age who live in the home of
their parents;
(2) An individual living in a long term care
facility or other medical institution shall
be allowed a thirty dollar ($30.00)
income level, and a couple in the same
room in a long term care facility shall
be allowed a sixty dollar ($60.00) as
income level a deduction for personal
needs described under Rule .0314
(Personal Needs Allowance) of this
Subchapter .
(3) Individuals who arc in a long term cam
facility for a temporary period of 3ix
months or less s hall be allowed the
income level provided by — statute in
addition to the thirty dollar ($30.00)
level .
Authority G.S. 108A-25(b); 108A-61; 42 C.ER.
435.135; 42 C.ER. 435.731; 42 C.ER. 435.732;
42 C.ER. 435.733; 42 C.F.R. 435.811; 42 C.ER.
435.812; 42 CER. 435.831; 42 CER. 435.832;
42 CER. 435.1007; 42 U.S.C 1383c(b); 42
U.S.C 1383c(d); 45 CER. 233.20; P.L. 99-272;
Section 12202; Alexander v. Flaherty Consent
Order filed February 14, 1992.
.0314 PERSONAL NEEDS
ALLOWANCE
An individual living in a long term care facility
or other medical institution shall be allowed an
amount for personal needs. The personal needs
allowance is the sum of the following, but not to
exceed the income maintenance level provided by
statute for a single individual (or a couple, if in the
same LTC room) in a private living arrangement.
in "
la)
Standard Personal Needs Amount:
A thirty dollar ($30.00) deduction for
one individual; or
£b] Sixty dollar ($60.00) deduction for a
married couple in the same long term
care facility; or
(cl Ninety dollar ($90.00) deduction for a
veteran (or the surviving spouse of a
veteran) with no living dependents
whose pension has been reduced to
ninety dollars ($90.00) by the Veterans
Administration;
(2) Individuals With Greater Need:
(a) Work Incentive Allowance: Individuals
who reside in an ICF or ICF-MR facili-
tv_ and who are regularly engaged in
work activities as part of their develop-
mental plan for which they receive
otherwise countable wages shall be
allowed an incentive deduction in the
following amounts:
321
9:5
NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER
June 1, 1994
PROPOSED RULES
Monthly Net Wages
$ 1 to $100
$101 to $200
$201 to $300
$301 and greater
Incentive Allowance
Up to $50
$80
$130
$212
(b) Guardianship fees: Individuals, for
whom a guardian of the estate has been
named by the court, shall be allowed.
for payment of guardianship fees.
whichever of the following amounts ]s
less:
£i) 10% of total monthly income from all
sources, both earned and unearned: or
(ii) Twenty-five dollars ($25.00) per
month.
Authority G.S. 108A-25(b); 42 C.ER. 435.135; 42
C.F.R. 435.731; 42 C.F.R. 435.732; 42 C.F.R.
435.733; 42 C.F.R. 435.831; 42 U.S.C. 1383c(b);
42 U.S.C. 1383c(d).
SECTION .0400 - BUDGETING
PRINCIPALS
.0407 PATIENT LIABILITY
(a) Patient liability shall apply to clients who
live in facilities for skilled nursing, intermediate
nursing, intermediate nursing for mental retarda-
tion or other medical institutions.
(b) The client's patient liability for cost of care
shall be computed as a monthly amount after
deducting the following from his total income:
(1) An amount for his personal needs as
established under Rule ^0344 .0314 of
this Subchapter;
(2) Income given to the community spouse
to provide him a total monthly income
from all sources, equal to the "mini-
mum monthly maintenance needs allow-
ance" as defined in 42 U.S.C.
1396r-5(d)(3)£AM);
(3) Income given to family members
described in 42 U.S.C. 1396r-5(d)(l),
to provide each, from all sources of
income, a total monthly income equal
to!
(A) One-third one third of the amount
established under 42 U.S.C.
1396r-5(d)(3)(A)(i);or
(B) Where there is no community spouse,
an amount for the number of
dependents, based on the income level
for the corresponding budget unit
number, as a pproved by the NC
General Assembly and stated in the
A ppropriations Act for categorically
and medically needy classifications:
(4) The income maintenance level provided
by statute for a single individual in a
private living arrangement with no
spouse or dependents at home, for
whom the physician of record has
provided a written statement that the
required treatment is such that the
patient is expected to return home
within six months, shall be allowed:
(5) {4) Ad amount for unmet medical needs
as determined under Paragraph (f) of
this Rule.
(c) Patient liability shall apply to institutional
charges incurred from the date of admission or the
first day of the month as appropriate and shall not
be prorated by days if the client lives in more than
one institution during the month.
(d) The county department of social services
shall notify the client, the institution and the state
of the amount of the monthly liability and any
changes or adjustments.
(e) When the patient liability as calculated in
Paragraph (b) of this Rule exceeds the Medicaid
reimbursement rate for the institution for a 31 day
month:
(1) The patient liability shall be the
institution's Medicaid reimbursement
rate for a 31 day month;
(2) The client shall be placed on a
deductible determined in accordance
with Federal regulations and Rules
.0404, .0405 and .0406 of this
Subchapter.
(f) The amount deducted from income for unmet
medical needs shall be determined as follows:
(1) Unmet medical needs shall be the costs
of:
(A) Medical care covered by the program
but that exceeds limits on coverage of
that care and that is not subject to
payment by a third party;
(B) Medical care recognized under State
and Federal tax law that is not
covered by the program and that is
not subject to payment by a third
party; and
(C) Medicare and other health insurance
premiums, deductibles, or coinsurance
charges that are not subject to
payment by a third party.
(2) The amount of unmet medical needs
9:5
NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER
June 1, 1994
322
PROPOSED RULES
deducted from the patient's monthly
income shall be limited to monthly
charges for Medicare and other health
insurance premiums.
(3) The actual amount of incurred costs
which are the patient's responsibility
shall be deducted when reported from
the patient's liability for one or more
months.
(4) Incurred costs shall be reported by the
end of the six month Medicaid
certification period following the
certification period in which they were
incurred.
Authority G.S. 108A-54; 42 C.ER. 435.732; 42
C.ER. 435.733; 42 C.F.R. 435.831; 42 C.F.R.
435.832; 42 U.S.C 1396r-5.
TITLE 15A - DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
Notice is hereby given in accordance with G.S.
150B-21.2 that EHNR - Commission for Health
Services intends to amend rule cited as 15A NCAC
18A .2508; and adopt rule cited as 15 A NCAC
18A .2539.
1 he proposed effective date of this action is
October 1, 1994.
1 he public hearing will be conducted at 1:30
p.m. on July 21, 1994 at the Archdale Building,
Ground Floor Hearing Room, 512 North Salisbury
Street, Raleigh, N C.
MXeason for Proposed Action:
15A NCAC 18A .2508 - NC General Statute 130A-
282 allows for pools constructed prior to May
1993 not to comply with certain design and con-
struction standards; however, if these pools are
remodeled they must meet all current design and
construction requirements. The proposed change
in the definition of "remodeled" would allow for
changes to be made in pool designs in order to
eliminate the potential for suction hazards created
by single drains without having to comply with all
other design at construction requirements.
This change will greatly reduce the cost of compli-
ance and should encourage owners of wading
pools with single drains to make the necessary
changes needed to eliminate the potential suction
hazards.
ISA NCAC 18A .2539 - This Rule is necessary to
reduce the risk of suction injury at public wading
pools.
Comment Procedures: All persons interested in
these matters are invited to attend the public
hearing. Written comments may be presented at
the public hearing or submitted to Grady L.
Balentine, Department of Justice, PO Box 629,
Raleigh, NC 27602-0629. All written comments
must be received by August 1 , 1994. Persons who
wish to speak at the hearing should contact Mr.
Balentine at (919) 733-4618. Persons who call in
advance of the hearing will be given priority on
the speaker 's list. Oral presentation lengths may
be limited depending on the number of people that
wish to speak at the public hearing. Only persons
who have made comments at a public hearing or
who have submitted written comments will be
allowed to speak at the Commission meeting.
Comments made at the Commission meeting must
either clarify previous comments or proposed
changes from staff pursuant to comments made
during the public hearing process.
IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THAT ALL
INTERESTED AND POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
PERSONS, GROUPS, BUSINESSES,
ASSOCIATIONS, INSTITUTIONS OR AGENCIES
MAKE THEIR VIEWS AND OPINIONS KNOWN
TO THE COMMISSION FOR HEALTH SERVICES
THROUGH THE PUBLIC HEARING AND
COMMENT PROCESS, WHETHER THEY
SUPPORT OR OPPOSE ANY OR ALL
PROVISIONS OF THE PROPOSED RULES. THE
COMMISSION MAY MAKE CHANGES TO THE
RULES AT THE COMMISSION MEETING IF THE
CHANGES COMPLY WITH G.S. 150B-21.2(f).
Auditor's Note: These Rules were filed as
temporary rules effective June 1, 1994 for a
period of 180 days or until the permanent rule
becomes effective, whichever is sooner.
CHAPTER 18 - ENVmONMENTAL
HEALTH
SUBCHAPTER 18 A - SANITATION
SECTION .2500 - PUBLIC SWIMMING
POOLS
323
9:5
NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER
June 1, 1994
PROPOSED RULES
.2508 DEFINITIONS
The following definitions shall apply throughout
this Section:
(1) Equipment replacement means
replacement of individual components of
the hydraulic and disinfection systems
such as pumps, filters, and automatic
chemical feeders.
(2) Public swimming pool means public
swimming pool as defined in G.S.
130A-280. Public swimming pools are
divided into three types:
(a) Swimming pools are all public
swimming pools except spas and
wading pools.
(b) Spas are special facilities designed for
recreational and therapeutic use which
are not drained, cleaned, or refilled
after each individual use. Spas may
include, but not be limited to, units
designed for hydrojet circulation, hot
water, cold water mineral bath, air
induction bubbles, or any combination
thereof. Common terminology for spas
includes "therapeutic pool",
"hydrotherapy pool", "whirlpool", "hot
spa", and "hot tub".
(c) Wading pools are small, shallow
swimming pools not more than 18
inches deep designed for use by
children.
(3) Remodeled means renovations requiring
disruption of major portions of the pool
shell or deck, changes in the pool profile,
or redesign of the pool hydraulic system.
Remodeled does not include equipment
replacement or repair or addition of
outlets for the purpose of reducing
suction hazards .
(4) Repair means repair of existing
equipment, replastering or repainting of
the pool interior, replacement of tiles or
coping and similar maintenance activities.
(b) Operators of all public wading pools shall
inspect pools daily to ensure the drain covers are
in good condition and securely attached.
Statutory Authority G.S. 130A-282.
Statutory Authority G. S. 130A-282.
.2539 SUCTION HAZARD REDUCTION
(a) At all public wading pools which use a
single main drain for circulation of water, signs
shall be posted stating: "WARNING Jo prevent
serious injury do not allow children in wading pool
if drain cover is broken or missing". Signs shall
be in letters at least one-half inch in height and
shall be posted where they are visible to people
entering the wading pool.
9:5
NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER
June 1, 1994
324
RRC OBJECTIONS
1 he Rules Review Commission (RRC) objected to the following rules in accordance with G.S.
143B-30.2(c). State agencies are required to respond to RRC as provided in G.S. 143B-30.2(d).
HUMAN RESOURCES
Children's Services
10 NCAC 41 F .0704 - Physical Facility
Agency Revised Rule
Facility Services
10 NCAC 3L .0906 - Compliance with Laws
Rule Withdrawn by Agency
Medical Assistance
10 NCAC 261 .0304 - Hearing Procedures
Agency Revised Rule
INSURANCE
Financial Evaluation Division
11 NCAC 11C .0308 - Foreign HMO: Successful Operation
Agency Revised Rule
11 NCAC 11F .0207 - Specific Standards for Morbidity, Interest and Mortality
Agency Revised Rule
11 NCAC 1 IF .0208 - Reserves for Waiver of Premium
Agency Revised Rule
LABOR
OSHA
RRC Objection 04/21/94
Obj. Removed 04/21/94
RRC Objection
Obj. Removed
RRC Objection
Obj. Removed
RRC Objection
Obj. Removed
RRC Objection
Obj. Removed
04/21/94
03/17/94
03/17/94
03/17/94
03/17/94
03/17/94
03/17/94
03/17/94
03/17/94
13 NCAC 7 A .0707 - \hriances and Other Relief Under Section 95-1 32(a) RRC Objection 04/21/94
Agency Revised Rule Obj. Removed 04/21/94
13 NCAC 7 A .0708 - \hriances and Other Relief Under Section 95-1 32(b) RRC Objection 04/21/94
Agency Revised Rule Obj. Removed 04/21/94
13 NCAC 7 A .0709 - Modification: Revocation: and Renewal of Rules or Orders RRC Objection 04/21/94
Agency Revised Rule Obj. Removed 04/21/94
13 NCAC 7 A .0710 - Action on Applications RRC Objection 04/21/94
Agency Revised Rule Obj. Removed 04/21/94
13 NCAC 7 A .0711 - Request for Hearings on Applications RRC Objection 04/21/94
Agency Revised Rule Obj. Removed 04/21/94
325
9:5
NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER
June 1, 1994
RRC OBJECTIONS
LICENSING BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
Certified Public Accountant Examiners
21 NCAC 8A . 0105 - Purposes and Responsibilities
Agency Repealed Rule
21 NCAC 8F .0103 - Filing of Examination Applications and Fees
Agency Revised Rule
21 NCAC 8F .0112 - Candidate's Request to Sit in Another Jurisdiction
Agency Revised Rule
21 NCAC 8G .0409 - Computation of CPE Credits
Agency Revised Rule
21 NCAC 8J .0008 - Firm Registration
Agency Revised Rule
21 NCAC 8N .0103 - CPAs Outside North Carolina
Agency Withdrew Rule
Dental Examiners
21 NCAC 161 .0003 - License Void Upon Failure to Renew
Agency Revised Rule
21 NCAC 16R .0002 - Approved Courses and Sponsors
Agency Revised Rule
Medical Examiners
RRC Objection
Obj. Removed
RRC Objection
Obj. Removed
RRC Objection
Obj. Removed
RRC Objection
Obj. Removed
RRC Objection
Obj. Removed
03/17/94
03/17/94
03/17/94
03/17/94
03/17/94
03/17/94
03/17/94
03/17/94
03/17/94
03/17/94
03/17/94
RRC Objection 04/21/94
Obj. Removed 04/21/94
RRC Objection 04/21/94
Obj. Removed 04/21/94
21 NCAC 32B .0402 - Fee
Agency Revised Rule
21 NCAC 32B .0706 - Fee
Agency Revised Rule
Real Estate Appraisal Board
21 NCAC 57 A .0210 - Temporary Practice
Agency Revised Rule
21 NCAC 57B .0207 - Administration
Agency Revised Rule
21 NCAC 57B .0306 - Instructor Requirements
Agency Revised Rule
21 NCAC 57B .0603 - Criteria For Course Approval
Agency Revised Rule
21 NCAC 57C .0104 - Petition to Reopen Proceeding
Agency Revised Rule
PUBLIC EDUCATION
Elementary and Secondary Education
16 NCAC 6C .0307 - Certificate Renewal
Agency Revised Rule
16 NCAC 6E .0202 - Interscholastic Athletics
RRC Objection 03/17/94
Obj. Removed 03/17/94
RRC Objection 03/17/94
Obj. Removed 03/17/94
RRC Objection
Obj. Removed
RRC Objection
Obj. Removed
RRC Objection
Obj. Removed
RRC Objection
Obj. Removed
RRC Objection
Obj. Removed
03/17/94
03/17/94
03/17/94
03/17/94
03/17/94
03/17/94
03/17/94
03/17/94
03/17/94
03/17/94
RRC Objection 04/21/94
RRC Objection 04/21/94
RRC Objection 04/21/94
9:5
NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER
June 1, 1994
326
RRC OBJECTIONS
REVENUE
Individual Income Tax Division
17 NCAC 6B .0612 - Tax Credit for Qualified Business Investments
Agency Revised Rule
STATE TREASURER
Collateralization of Deposits
20 NCAC 7 . 0202 - Amount of Collateral Required to be Pledged
Agency Revised Rule
20 NCAC 7 .0603 - Acceleration of Maturities
Agency Revised Rule
RRC Objection
Obj. Removed
03/17/94
03/17/94
RRC Objection 03/17/94
Obj. Removed 03/17/94
RRC Objection 03/17/94
Obj. Removed 03/17/94
327
9:5
NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER
June 1, 1994
CONTESTED CASE DECISIONS
1 his Section contains the full text of some of the more significant Administrative Law Judge decisions
along with an index to all recent contested cases decisions which are filed under North Carolina's
Administrative Procedure Act. Copies of the decisions listed in the index and not published are available
upon request for a minimal charge by contacting the Office of Administrative Hearings, (919) 733-2698.
AGENCY
CASE
NUMBER
A1J
DVTEOF
DECISION
PUBLISHED DECISION
REGISTER CITATION
ADMINISTRATION
North Carolina Council for Women
Family Violence Prevention Services v. N.C. Council for Women
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL COMMISSION
Alcoholic Beverage Control Comm. v. Entertainment Group, Inc.
Rayvon Stewart v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Commission
Alcoholic Beverage Control Comm. v. Peggy Sutton Walters
Russell Bernard Speller d/b/a Cat's Disco v. Alcoholic Bev Ctl Comm.
Edvraid Ogunjobi, Club Piccadilli v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Comm.
Robert Kovalaske, Nick Pikoulas, Joseph Marshburn, Evangelos Pikoulas,
d/b/a Our Mom's BBQ v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Commission
Christine George Williams v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Comm.
Alcoholic Beverage Control Comm. v. Raleigh Limits. Inc.
COMMERCE
Savings Institutions Division
James E. Byers, et al v. Savings Institutions
CORRECTION
Division of Prisons
Gene Strader v. Department of Correction
CRIME CONTROL AND PUBLIC SAFETY
Crime Victims Compensation Commission
James Hugh Baynes v. Crime Victims Compensation Commission
Ross T. Bond v. Victims Compensation Commission
James A. Canady v. Crime Victims Compensation Commission
Virginia Roof v. Department of Crime Control & Public Safety
Percy Clark v. Crime Victims Compensation Commission
Barbara Henderson v. Crime Victims Compensation Commission
Shirley Handsome v. Crime Victims Compensation Commission
Georgeann \bung v. Crime Victims Compensation Commission
Lawrence L. Tyson v. Crime Victims Compensation Commission
Mary E. Haskins v. Crime Victims Compensation Commission
ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Coastal Management
Roger Fuller v. EHNR, Divs. of Coastal Mgmt & Environmental Mgmt
Roger Fuller v. EHNR, Divs. of Coastal Mgmt & Environmental Mgmt
Gary E. Montalbine v. Division of Coastal Management
94 DOA 0242
West
93 COM 1622 Chess
04/13/94
93 ABC 0719
Gray
03/02/94
93 ABC 0793
Nesnow
04/11/94
93 ABC 0906
Mann
03/18/94
93 ABC 0937
Morrison
03/07/94
93 ABC 1024
West
03/03/94
93 ABC 1029
Gray
03/04/94
93 ABC 1057
Bee ton
04/21/94
93 ABC 1485
Mann
03/11/94
03/01/94
94 DOC 0252 Morrison 03/21/94
93 CPS 0801
West
03/28/94
93 CPS 1104
West
04/21/94
93 CPS 1108
Gray
03/28/94
93 CPS 1347
Nesnow
03/24/94
94 CPS 0127
Reilly
04/19/94
94 CPS 0259
Morrison
04/07/94
94 CPS 0286
Gray
04/28/94
94 CPS 0292
Reilly
04/18/94
94 CPS 0368
Gray
04/26/94
94 CPS 1406
Gray
03/17/94
89 EHR 1378"* Gray 04/07/94
90 EHR 0017* Gray 04/07/94
93 EHR 1792 Nesnow 03/21/94
9:2 NCR 114
* Consolidated Cases.
9:5
NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER
June 1, 1994
328
CONTESTED CASE DECISIONS
AGENCY
CASE
NUMBER
ALJ
DATE OF
DECISION
PUBLISHED DECISION
REGISTER CITATION
Environmental Health
Jane C. CMallcy, Melvin L. Cartwright v. EHNR & District Hlth Dept
Pasquotank-Perquimans-Camden-Chowan
Environment, Health, & Natural Res. v. Clark Harris & Jessie Lee Harris
Scotland Water Co., Laurin Lakes v. Environment, Health, & Nat. Res.
91 EHR0838
Bee ton
04/06/94
93 EHR 0924
Bee ton
03/03/94
94 EHR 0200
Nesnow
04/27/94
Environmental Management
Petroleum Installation Equipment Co., Inc. v. Env., Health & Nat. Res.
Jack Griffin v. Dept. of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
93 EHR 0531
93 EHR 1030
Chess 03/21/94
Becton 03/21/94
Marine Fisheries
Robert I. Swinson, Virginia S. Swinson v. EHNR, Div/Marine Fisheries 93 EHR 0394 Gray 04/1 1/94
Solid Waste Management
Roger Sessoms v. EHNR/ Asbestos Hazard Management Branch 93 EHR 0951
Bertie Citizens Action Coalition, Inc.; Willaid J. Oliver, Reginald Early, 93 EHR 1045
Herbert Jenkins, Jr., Lindwood Earl Tripp, Willie Warren Tripp, Mary
Alice Cherry, and Kathy Burden v. EHNR, Solid Waste Management
Division, and East Carolina Environmental, Inc., Addington Environmental,
Inc., ct al.
Gray 03/28/94
Morrison 04/06/94
9:3 NCR 214
HUMAN RESOURCES
Division of Child Development
Judith Fridley v. Div. of Child Development/Abuse/Neglect Unit
DHR, Division of Child Development v. Joyce Gale
Gloria C. Haith v. Department of Human Resources
Gloria C. Haith v. Daycare Consultant
Charles E. Smith v. Department of Human Resources
Living Word Day Care, Jonathan Lankford v. Dept. of Human Resources
93 DHR 0973
Morrison
03/08/94
93 DHR 1344
Gray
04/28/94
93 DHR 1707
Nesnow
03/22/94
93 DHR 1787
Nesnow
03/14/94
93 DHR 1797
Nesnow
03/21/94
94 DHR 0168
Nesnow
03/23/94
Facility Services
Charles E. Hunter, Jr., M.D. & Coastal Perfusion Svcs, Inc. v. Cert of
Need Section, Div of Facility Svcs, DHR, and Wilmington Perfusion
Corp. and Howard F. Marks, Jr., M.D.
Presbyterian-Orthopaedic Hospital v. Department of Human Resources
Lowell Stafford v. Department of Human Resources
Division of Medical Assistance
JR., by and through her agent & Personal Rep., Hank Neal v. DHR
David Yott v. Department of Human Resources
Division of Medical Assistance v. Catawba Cry Dept. of Social Services
93 DHR. 0746
Morgan
04/11/94
93 DHR 0805
Reilly
03/11/94
93 DHR 1381
Gray
04/15/94
93 DHR 0528
Gray
04/27/94
93 DHR 1113
Gray
04/05/94
93 DHR 1778
West
03/04/94
Division of Social Services
Evelyn Moore v. Department of Human Resources
Child Support Enforcement Section
William HeckBtall v. Department of Human Resources
Bryan Jeffrey Cole v. Department of Human Resources
Dexter L. Chambers v. Department of Human Resources
Ronald E. Johnson v. Department of Human Resources
Roger Moore v. Department of Human Resources
AJvin Lee Martin v. Department of Human Resources
Robert Young v. Department of Human Resources
Antonio Townscnd v. Department of Human Resources
Troy E. Pinkney v. Department of Human Resources
Anthony A. Macon v. Department of Human Resources
Walter Lee Corbett v. Department of Human Resources
Joe Louis Mayo v. Department of Human Resources
94 DHR 0293
Reilly
04/15/94
93 CSE 1077
Reilly
03/14/94
93 CSE 1091
Becton
03/30/94
93 CSE 1 124
West
03/28/94
93 CSE 1125
Becton
03/30/94
93 CSE 1127
Becton
04/14/94
93 CSE 1128
Nesnow
04/04/94
93 CSE 1133
Reilly
04/18/94
93 CSE 1139
Becton
03/30/94
93 CSE 1148
Mann
03/29/94
93 CSE 1149
Gray
04/26/94
93 CSE 1150
Reilly
03/30/94
93 CSE 1161
West
04/19/94
329
9:5
NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER
June 1, 1994
CONTESTED CASE DECISIONS
AGENCY
Nash Andrew NewBome v. Department of Human Resources
James E. Watson v. Department of Human Resources
Robert Lee Barrett v. Department of Human Resources
Betty A. Williams, Fred E. Jones v. Department of Human Resources
Eric G. Sykes v. Department of Human Resources
Willie C. Hollis v. Department of Human Resources
Bernadett Cook v. Department of Human Resources
Dennis W. Nolan v. Department of Human Resources
Robert Calvin Connor v. Department of Human Resources
James D. Williams v. Department of Human Resources
Vaughn D. Pearsall v. Department of Human Resources
Sidney Ray Tuggle Jr. v. Department of Human Resources
George Aaron Collins v. Department of Human Resources
Samuel L. Dodd v. Department of Human Resources
William A. Sellers v. Department of Human Resources
Kenneth W Cooper v. Department of Human Resources
Steven A. Elmquist v. Department of Human Resources
Mark E. Rogers v. Department of Human Resources
Daniel Thomas Hefele v. Department of Human Resources
Gilbert J. Gutierrez v. Department of Human Resources
Alton D. Johnson v. Department of Human Resources
Chester Sanders v. Department of Human Resources
Rodney Guyton v. Department of Human Resources
Donald W. Clark v. Department of Human Resources
William E. David Jr. v. Department of Human Resources
Timothy D. Evans v. Department of Human Resources
Billy Edward Smith v. Department of Human Resources
Allen D. Terrell v. Department of Human Resources
Ray C. Moses v. Department of Human Resources
Bart Ransom v. Department of Human Resources
William H. Simpson Sr. v. Department of Human Resources
James D. McClure Jr. v. Department of Human Resources
Douglas L. Cherrix v. Department of Human Resources
Dwayne Lament Thompson v. Department of Human Resources
Horace Lee Bass v. Department of Human Resources
Michael Wilder v. Department of Human Resources
James A. Cephas v. Department of Human Resources
Wade A. Burgess v. Department of Human Resources
Billy Dale Beaney v. Department of Human Resources
James E. Wiggins Sr. v. Department of Human Resources
Timothy J. Jones v. Department of Human Resources
Randall E. Hunter v. Department of Human Resources
Alton E. Simpson Jr. v. Department of Human Resources
John William Vance Jr. v. Department of Human Resources
Royston D. Blandford 111 v. Department of Human Resources
CASE
DATE OF PUBLISHED DECISION
NUMBER
ALJ
DECISION REGISTER CITATION
93CSE 1170
Mann
03/17/94
93CSE 1171
Gray
04/26/94
93CSE 1172
Morrison
04/20/94
93 CSE 1178
Nesnow
04/20/94
93 CSE 1181
Bee ton
04/20/94
93 CSE 1191
Becton
05/09/94
93 CSE 1202
Gray
04/27/94
93 CSE 1254
Morrison
04/27/94
93 CSE 1258
West
04/19/94
93 CSE 1259
West
04/19/94
93 CSE 1267
Becton
04/20/94
93 CSE 1307
West
04/25/94
93 CSE 1331
West
04/25/94
93 CSE 1357
Gray
03/31/94
93 CSE 1359
Morrison
04/20/94
93 CSE 1364
West
04/27/94
93 CSE 1392
Reilly
04/29/94
93 CSE 1415
Mann
05/03/94
93 CSE 1432
Morrison
04/28/94
93 CSE 1433
Morrison
05/13/94
93 CSE 1434
Reilly
04/29/94
93 CSE 1437
West
04/19/94
93 CSE 1439
West
04/21/94
93 CSE 1441
Nesnow
05/13/94
93 CSE 1442
Nesnow
05/02/94
93 CSE 1460
Reilly
04/28/94
93 CSE 1461
West
04/19/94
93 CSE 1463
Nesnow
05/02/94
93 CSE 1464
Nesnow
04/28/94
93 CSE 1495
Morrison
04/29/94
93 CSE 1497
West
04/19/94
93 CSE 1500
Becton
05/13/94
93 CSE 1512
Gray
05/13/94
93 CSE 1515
Morrison
04/21/94
93 CSE 1520
Morrison
05/13/94
93 CSE 1521
Reilly
04/28/94
93 CSE 1523
Reilly
05/13/94
93 CSE 1568
Morrison
04/28/94
93 CSE 1569
Morrison
05/13/94
93 CSE 1571
Morrison
05/13/94
93 CSE 1576
West
04/19/94
93 CSE 1579
West
04/19/94
93 CSE 1591
Becton
04/20/94
93 CSE 1597
Becton
05/13/94
94 CSE 0095
West
04/19/94
JUSTICE
Alarm Systems Licensing Board
Alarm Systems Licensing Board v. George P. Baker
Private Protective Services Board
Larry C. Hopkins v. Private Protective Services Board
Training and Standards Division
93 DOJ 0457
93 DOJ 1618
Nesnow
03/10/94
Morrison 03/07/94
Curtiss Lance Potest v. Criminal Justice Ed. & Training Stds. Comm. 93 DOJ 0231
Willie David Moore v. Criminal Justice Ed. & Training Stds. Comm. 93 DOJ 1071
Glenn Travis Stout v. Criminal Justice Ed. & Training Stds. Comm. 93 DOJ 1409
Gregory Blake Manning v. Criminal Justice Ed. & Training Stds. Comm. 94 DOJ 0048
Chess 03/28/94
Nesnow 04/11/94
Gray 03/03/94
Gray 03/29/94
9:3 NCR 218
MORTUARY SCIENCE
Mortuary Science v. Perry J. Brown, & Brown's Funeral Directors
93 BMS 0532
Chess
03/28/94
9:5
NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER
June 1, 1994
330
CONTESTED CASE DECISIONS
AGENCY
CASE
NUMBER
DATE OF
ALJ DECISION
PUBLISHED DECISION
REGISTER CITATION
PUBLIC EDUCATION
Nancy Watson v. Board of Education
Janet L. Wilcox v. Carteret County Board of Education
STATE HEALTH BENEFITS OFFICE
Linda C. Campbell v. Teachers & St Emp Major Medical Plan
Timothy L. Coggins v. Teachera' & St Emp Comp Major Med Plan
STATE PERSONNEL
Agricultural and Technical State University
Linda D. Williams v. Agricultural and Technical State University
Juanita D. Murphy v. Agricultural and Technical State University
Thomas M. Simpson v. Agricultural and Technical State University
Catawba County
Sandra J. Cunningham v. Catawba County
North Carolina Central University
Ha-Vilyah Ha-She'B v. NCCU
Department of Commerce
Ruth Daniel-ferry v. Department of Commerce
Department of Correction
Leland K. Williams v. Department of Correction
Bert Esworthy v. Department of Correction
Alfred B. Hunt v. Department of Correction
Adrian E. Graham v. Intensive Probation/Parole
Department of Crime Control and Public Safety
Fred L. Kearney v. Department of Crime Control & Public Safety
Sylvia Nance v. Department of Crime Control & Public Safety
Employment Security Commission of North Carolina
Rejeanne B. LeFrancois v. Employment Security Commission of N.C.
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Marine Fisheries
William D. Nicely v. Environment, Health, & Natural Resources
Department of Human Resources
Inez Latta v. Department of Human Resources
Charla S. Davis v. Department of Human Resources
Rose Mary Taylor v. Department of Human Resources, Murdoch Center
David R. Rodgers v. Jimmy Summerville, Stonewall Jackson School
Durham County Department of Social Services
Belinda F. Jones v. Daniel Hudgins, Durham Cty Dept of Social Svcs
Menial Health/Mental Retardation
Yvonne G. Johnson v. Blue Ridge Mental Health
93 EDC 0234
93 EDC 0451
93 INS 0410
93 INS 0929
93 OSP 1097
93 OSP 0875
93 OSP 0725
91 OSP 0401
92 OSP 1463
93 OSP 1069
Chess
Mann
Bee ton
Morrison
02/28/94
02/21/94
04/22/94
03/04/94
9:2 NCR 108
93 OSP 0089
Chess
03/23/94
93 OSP 0708
Morrison
03/16/94
93 OSP 1393
Gray
03/24/94
Reilly
Becton
Chess
04/29/94
04/13/94
03/04/94
91 OSP 1287
Chess
02/22/94
93 OSP 0711
Chess
04/21/94
94 OSP 0243
Reilly
04/20/94
94 OSP 0261
Morrison
04/26/94
West
Reilly
West
03/18/94
03/21/94
04/08/94
92 OSP 1454 Becton 05/04/94
93 OSP 0830 Becton
93 OSP 1762 Gray
93 OSP 0047 Gray
94 OSP 0087 Chess
93 OSP 0728 Chess
93 OSP 1604 Becton
03/28/94
03/03/94
05/06/94
03/16/94
04/11/94
03/18/94
9:4 NCR 292
9:3 NCR 211
9:1 NCR 63
9:5 NCR 333
331
9:5
NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER
June 1, 1994
CONTESTED CASE DECISIONS
AGENCY
Wake County Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance
Julia Morgan Brannon v. Wake County MD/DD/SAS
Department of Transportation
Glenn I. Hodge Jr. v. Samuel Hunt, Sec'y Dept of Transportation
Glenn I. Hodge Jr. v. Samuel Hunt, Sec'y Dept of Transportation
Betsy Johnston Powell v. Department of Transportation
Clyde Lem Hairston v. Department of Transportation
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Eric W. Browning v. UNC-Chapel Hill
STATE TREASURER
Retirement Systems Division
John C. Russell v. Bd. /Trustees/Teachers* & State Employees' Ret. SyB.
Robert A. Slade v. Bd./Trustees/N.C. Local Govtl. Emp. Ret. SyBtem
Elizabeth M. Dudley v. Bd. /Trustees/Teachers' & State Employees'
Retirement System
CASE
DATE OF
NUMBER
ALJ
DECISION
Abuse Services
94OSP0214
Reilly
04/14/94
PUBLISHED DECISION
REGISTER CITATION
93 OSP 0297* 1
93 OSP 0500* 1
93 OSP 0550
93 OSP 0944
93 OSP 0925
Morrison 03/10/94
Morrison 03/10/94
Morrison 03/28/94
Chess 02/28/94
Morrison 05/03/94
93 DST 0164
93 DST 0785
93 DST 1474
West 03/07/94
Becton 03/18/94
Nesnow 03/28/94
9:1 NCR 60
9:1 NCR 60
9:5 NCR 342
9:1 NCR 68
9:5
NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER
June 1, 1994
332
CONTESTED CASE DECISIONS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF CARTERET
IN THE OFFICE OF
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
92 OSP 1454
WILLIAM D. NICELY,
Petitioner,
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL
RESOURCES, DIVISION OF MARINE
FISHERD2S,
Respondent
This matter was heard before Brenda B. Becton, Administrative Law Judge, on September 7-8, 1993
and on December 13, 1993 in Raleigh, North Carolina. At the conclusion of the hearing, the parties were
afforded an opportunity to file post-hearing submissions. The record in this matter was closed on February
18, 1994.
APPEARANCES
Petitioner: SCHILLER LAW OFFICES, Raleigh, North
Carolina, Marvin Schiller appearing.
Respondent: Robin W. Smith, Assistant Attorney General,
North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina.
ISSUES
1 . Was the Petitioner terminated with just cause?
2. Whether the termination letter lacks the requisite specificity required by North Carolina General
Statutes §126-35.
3. Whether, prior to the dismissal, the Petitioner was furnished with a statement in writing setting forth
in numerical order the specific acts or omissions that are the reason for his termination.
4. Whether the Petitioner was afforded a meaningful pre-termination hearing.
EXHIBITS
Petitioner's exhibits 1-21 were offered and received in evidence.
Respondent's exhibits 1 - 27 were offered and received in evidence.
STATUTES INVOLVED
N.C. Gen. Stat. §§126-35 and 126-37
333
9:5
NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER
June 1, 1994
CONTESTED CASE DECISIONS
STIPULATIONS
1. "All parties are properly before the Administrative Law Judge of the Office of Administrative
Hearings, the Office of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction of the parties and the subject matter,
and jurisdiction is conferred by N.C. Gen. Stat. §126-37."
2. "The Petitioner, Mr. William D. Nicely, was a permanent state employee within the meaning of N.C.
Gen. Stat. §126-39 at the time of his discharge from employment from the Respondent by letter dated
July 31, 1992."
3. "The Petitioner's final salary with the Respondent was $2,769.25 a month."
FINDINGS OF FACT
From official documents in the file, sworn testimony of the witnesses, and other competent and
admissible evidence, it is found as a fact that:
1 . At the time of his discharge, the Petitioner had been employed with the Respondent for approximately
eighteen (18) years and eleven (11) months.
2. At all times during the period between January 1, 1992, and July 31, 1992, the Petitioner was an
Enforcement Officer II whose job functions included enforcing the laws of the State of North Carolina
and the regulations of the Division of Marine Fisheries regarding fishing, patrolling the sound areas
for violations, and assisting fishermen.
3. Prior to the Petitioner's discharge from employment with the Respondent, the Petitioner was
suspended without pay effective July 21, 1992.
4. The discharge letter dated July 31, 1992 states that the reasons for the Petitioner's dismissal were:
Defraudment of the Division of Marine Fisheries by signing contract,
requesting payment, and being issued check for contracted services rendered
from another government agency while receiving payment from the Division
of Marine Fisheries for services during the same time period (June 30,
1992). Failure to follow written and verbal instructions from your
immediate supervisor (July 18, 1992) and failure to follow written
instructions from the Deputy Director of Operations (July 21, 1992).
The Defraudment Issue
5. The Petitioner taught classes in firearms safety, firearms qualification, and cardio-pulmonary
resuscitation in the Spring 1992 Division of Marine Fisheries In-Service Training Program at the
Justice Academy in Salemburg, North Carolina on March 10-11 and March 31-April 1, 1992.
6. The Spring 1992 In-Service Training Program was offered in conjunction with Sampson Community
College ("SCC") which employed the instructors for the program.
7. Prior to teaching in the first session of the In-Service Training Program on March 10, 1992, the
Petitioner advised the Director of Extension Services in the Small Business Center at SCC, Mr. J.W.
Simmons, that the Petitioner's employment as a part-time instructor by SCC would not conflict with
his employment by the Respondent because he had adequate compensatory time available to him from
the Division of Marine Fisheries ("DMF") to allow him to take leave from DMF for the time that he
was scheduled to teach.
9:5 NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER June 1, 1994 334
CONTESTED CASE DECISIONS
8. On March 9, 1992, the Petitioner signed two part-time instructor contracts with SCC to teach in the
In-Service Training Program on March 10 and 11, 1992.
9. A DMF employee is required by DMF policy to obtain a supervisor's approval before taking leave,
including compensatory time.
10. The Petitioner did not obtain approval from DMF to engage in secondary employment as a part-time
instructor at SCC.
1 1 . The Petitioner told his supervisor, Mike Hardison, the Assistant Supervisor for the Central District,
that he intended to take compensatory leave for the time that he was scheduled to teach in the In-
Service Training Program. At that time, Mr. Hardison indicated that he would have to talk with his
supervisor regarding the Petitioner's taking compensatory leave to teach.
12. On Monday, March 16, 1992, the Petitioner submitted his weekly activity report for the week of
March 9-13, showing that he had taken leave on March 10 and 11, 1992.
13. On Tuesday, March 17, 1992, the Central District Supervisor, Woody Hancock, following further
discussion of the matter with Assistant Deputy Director Fentress H. Munden, notified the Petitioner
that it had been determined that it would be inappropriate for the Petitioner to use compensatory time
in order to be reimbursed by SCC to teach in a DMF In-Service Training Program, and therefore,
the Petitioner was not authorized to use compensatory time for March 10-11.
14. The Petitioner was requested to submit a revised activity report for the week of March 9-13, 1992.
The Petitioner complied and submitted another activity report indicating that he had worked eight
hours on the days in question.
15. In that same meeting with Mr. Hancock on March 17, 1992, the Petitioner's request to use
compensatory time to teach in the second session of the DMF In-Service Training Program on March
31, 1992 and April 1, 1992 was denied.
16. After changing his activity report as requested, the Petitioner's weekly activity reports for the weeks
of March 7-14 and March 28-April 3, 1992 indicate work hours for DMF on March 10-11 and March
31 -April 1, 1992.
17. The Petitioner's monthly Record of Hours Worked and Leave Taken for the months of March and
April, 1992 indicate that the Petitioner worked for DMF on March 10-11 and March 31-April 1,
1992.
18. The Petitioner had no compensatory time available to him in the months of March and April of 1992
because DMF enforcement officers were paid at the end of February for unused compensatory time
that had accumulated during the previous calendar year. However, on March 2, 1992, when his
February, 1992, record of hours worked and leave taken report was prepared, he did have 16 hours
of compensatory time available.
19. The Petitioner signed two additional part-time instructor contracts with SCC to teach in the March
31 and April 1, 1992 DMF In-Service Training Program.
20. The testimony regarding the date the contracts for the March 31 and April 1, 1992 In-Service
Training Program were signed was contradictory. The Petitioner contends that he signed two blank
contracts when he signed the contracts for the March 10-11, 1992 training session. The Respondent
contends that the contracts for the second training session were signed after the Petitioner had been
told that he could not take compensatory time off to teach.
335 9:5 NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER June 1, 1994
CONTESTED CASE DECISIONS
21. It is clear that the two contracts were not signed on March 31, 1992, the date that appears next to the
Petitioner's signature, since the Petitioner was teaching in Salemburg on that date and he did not have
any means of transporting himself to SCC to sign any contracts. There is not sufficient evidence to
make a finding regarding when the contracts were signed.
22. On or around June 5, 1992, a SCC employee contacted the Petitioner by telephone to remind him that
the College needed a copy of his social security card before checks could be issued to pay the
Petitioner for his services as a part-time instructor on March 10-11 and March 31-April 1, 1992.
23. The Petitioner sent SCC a copy of his social security card between June 5, 1992 and June 30, 1992.
24. The Petitioner did not inform officials at SCC that he could not accept payment from the College for
teaching in the DMF program when he spoke with them on June 5, 1992 or when he sent them a copy
of his social security card.
25. SCC issued a check, No. 2019678, on June 30, 1992 to the Petitioner in payment for his services as
a Part-time instructor on March 10-11 and March 31-April 1, 1992.
26. The check issued to the Petitioner by SCC was mailed to the address the Petitioner provided the
College at the time the contracts were signed.
27. The Petitioner never advised SCC of his change of address.
28. Although the Petitioner testified that he intended to turn the check from SCC over to DMF when he
received it just as one would payment of jury duty, he never informed any of his supervisors that he
expected to receive a check from SCC and never discussed with them the possibility of turning over
any check that he might receive from SCC to DMF
29. The Petitioner did not receive the check from SCC until after his dismissal on July 31, 1992.
30. Petitioner never deposited or cashed the check obliquely referred to in the termination letter, but,
rather, he personally delivered the check to Ms. Debbie Beaty, a personnel officer of the Respondent,
during his Step III departmental appeal hearing on August 14, 1992.
31. The check the Petitioner presented to Ms. Beaty at his Step HI grievance hearing was in an envelope
with a change of address sticker attached to it.
The Failure to Follow Instructions Issue
32. On July 1, 1992, Central District Supervisor Woody Hancock issued a memorandum to all Central
District enforcement officers directing them to work from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on the Saturdays
and Sundays that they were assigned to work unless they obtained a supervisor's approval to work
different hours.
33. DMF enforcement officers are sworn law enforcement officers with the primary responsibility of
enforcing state fisheries rules regulating such matters as seasons for taking specific types of fish, size
of catch, type of fishing equipment, and fishing in polluted waters.
34. DMF does not have a sufficient number of officers to provide twenty-four hour coverage of the North
Carolina coast; the agency can provide approximately eight hours of coverage each day.
9:5 NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER June 1, 1994 336
CONTESTED CASE DECISIONS
35. The Standard Operating Procedures of the Law Enforcement branch of the N.C. Division of Marine
Fisheries (which are applicable to Petitioner) state, in pertinent part, as follows:
"[OJfficers are normally expected to schedule their own work hours within
a 40 hour week. Such hours shall be scheduled around peak fishing activity
for the officer's area and will include day and/or night patrol by vehicle or
boat or serving as an observer aboard aircraft."
36. DMF supervisors are responsible for setting work schedules for the officers under their supervision
and setting priorities for enforcement work as necessary.
37. The Petitioner was present at a July 16, 1992 meeting of Central District enforcement officers during
which then Acting Supervisor Michael Hardison reiterated the directive regarding weekend work
hours set out in the Hancock memorandum of July 1, 1992.
39. Mr. Hardison testified that he did not give Petitioner permission to work a "split shift" on July 18,
1992.
40. During the July 16th meeting, the Petitioner mentioned that he was receiving complaints during the
early morning and late afternoons. The Petitioner took Mr. Hardison's response that the Petitioner
was to "Cover your complaints but keep in touch" to mean that he had permission to work a split
shift.
41. On Saturday, July 18, 1992, the Petitioner reported to work at 5:00 a.m. and worked until 8:00 a.m.
He notified the dispatcher that he would be out of service at 8:00 a.m. until 3:00 p.m. that afternoon.
42. On Saturday, July 18, 1992, the Petitioner taught a Basic Law Enforcement Training course at
Carteret Community College.
43. Between 8:00 a.m. and 1:30 p.m., the Petitioner called the DMF dispatcher on an hourly basis to
check to see if there were any complaints or other activity that he needed to respond to.
44. The Petitioner did not leave a phone number with the dispatcher regarding where he could be reached
at Carteret Community College because changes in the College's phone system had temporarily
blocked incoming calls.
45. Acting Supervisor Hardison contacted the DMF dispatcher on duty on July 18, 1992 and learned that
the Petitioner had checked out of service from 8:00 a.m. until 3:00 p.m.
46. Mr. Hardison went looking for the Petitioner and found him at Carteret Community College. He
noted that the Petitioner's DMF vehicle and radio were at the Petitioner's home and the DMF
dispatcher could not reach the Petitioner by telephone at Carteret Community College.
47. Mr. Hardison told the Petitioner that he did not need him if he could not be trusted to work the hours
scheduled. He instructed the Petitioner to take vacation for the remainder of the day and to not report
to work until Tuesday, July 21, 1992.
337 9:5 NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER June 1, 1994
CONTESTED CASE DECISIONS
48. On July 21, 1992, Hancock, Hardison, Central District Manager David Taylor, and Deputy Director
Munden met with the Petitioner. In that meeting, Deputy Director Munden hand-delivered a
memorandum notifying the Petitioner that he had been placed on investigative suspension based on
the Petitioner's failure to comply with a supervisory directive to work from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
on Saturdays and Sundays and had, instead, engaged in secondary employment during hours that he
was scheduled to be on duty for DMF. The memorandum specifically referred to the Petitioner's
teaching activities at Carteret Community College on July 18, 1992. In the same memorandum,
Munden directed the Petitioner not to have any contact with DMF employees during the period of his
suspension.
The Dismissal
49. On July 30, 1992, DMF Director William Hogarth and Deputy Director Munden met with the
Petitioner to conduct a pre-dismissal conference. In that meeting, Director Hogarth asked the
Petitioner to respond to allegations concerning: 1) unlawfully obtaining double reimbursement from
another state agency, Sampson Community College, to teach in the Spring 1992 DMF In-Service
Training program; 2) engaging in secondary employment with Carteret Community College on July
18, 1992 during hours the Petitioner was scheduled to be on duty for DMF and in violation of a
specific supervisory directive concerning weekend duty hours; 3) engaging in secondary employment
with Carteret Community College while scheduled to be on-duty on other dates; 4) contacting DMF
employees during the period of the Petitioner's investigatory suspension in violation of a specific
order from Munden set out in the investigatory suspension memorandum of July 21, 1992.
50. Director Hogarth recessed the July 30, 1992 conference with the Petitioner from approximately 2:20
p.m. until 4:00 p.m. to allow the Petitioner to obtain class schedules and other documents that the
Petitioner requested that he be allowed to consult in order to try to respond to questions about his
secondary employment by Carteret Community College.
51. In the July 30, 1992 conference with the Petitioner, Director Hogarth asked the Petitioner about the
check from SCC. The Petitioner responded by informing Director Hogarth that he had not received
a check from SCC and indicated that some of his mail was not being forwarded to his new address.
52. On July 31, 1992, Director Hogarth called the Petitioner and delivered a notice of dismissal.
53. The Petitioner received compensation from DMF for the period of time that he was placed on
investigative suspension between July 21, 1992 and July 31, 1992.
Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact, the undersigned Administrative Law Judge makes the
following:
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1 . The Petitioner, William D. Nicely, was a permanent State employee at the time of his dismissal on
July 31, 1992. Because he has alleged that the Respondent lacked just cause for his dismissal, the
Office of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction to hear his appeal and issue a recommendation to
the State Personnel Commission which shall make the final decision in this matter. N.C. Gen. Stat.
§§126-35, -37, -39 and §§150B-23, -36.
2. At the time the Petitioner was discharged, North Carolina General Statutes section 126-35 provided,
in pertinent part, that no permanent State employee subject to the State Personnel Act shall be
discharged, suspended, or demoted for disciplinary reasons, except for just cause.
3. A just cause issue presents both substantive and procedural questions.
9:5 NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER June 1, 1994 338
CONTESTED CASE DECISIONS
4. Where just cause is an issue, the Respondent bears the ultimate burden of persuasion.
5. A permanent state employee may be dismissed for inadequate performance of duties or for personal
conduct that is detrimental to State service. Leiphart v. N.C. School of Arts . 80 N.C. App. 339, 342
S.E.2d 914 (1986).
6. Prior to dismissal, an employee is entitled to a meaning opportunity to respond to the charges that
are the basis for the proposed dismissal. Bishop v. N.C. Dept. of Human Resources, O' Berry
Center . 100 N.C. App. 175, 394 S.E.2d 702 (1990). The Petitioner's July 30, 1992 conference with
DMF Director Hogarth and Deputy Director Munden provided the Petitioner with an adequate
opportunity to respond to the allegations presented to him at that time.
7. Prior to dismissal for cause related to job performance, a permanent state employee is entitled to three
separate warnings that his/her performance is unsatisfactory. Jones v. Department of Human
Resources , 300 N.C. 687, 268 S.E.2d 500 (1980).
8. An employee discharged for personal misconduct is not entitled to prior progressive warnings because
personal misconduct discipline is imposed for actions for which no reasonable person should expect
to receive prior warning. Office of State Personnel, Personnel Manual , pp. 9-3, 9-8.3.
9. When an employee is subjected to disciplinary action, the employee shall, before the action is taken,
be furnished with a statement in writing setting forth in numerical order the specific acts or omissions
that are the reasons for the disciplinary action and the employee's appeal rights.
10. North Carolina General Statutes section 126-35 requires that the alleged acts or omissions of
misconduct by a permanent or career state employee be described in the termination letter with
sufficient particularity so that the discharged employee will know precisely what act or acts were the
basis of his discharge. Leiphart y^ North Carolina School of Arts . 80 N.C. App. 339, 342 S.E. 2d
914 (1986).
1 1 . The Respondent's termination letter did not fulfill the specificity requirements of North Carolina
General Statutes section 126-35.
12. The first allegation was that the Petitioner was guilty of "[d]efraudment of the Division of Marine
Fisheries by signing contract, requesting payment, and being issued check for contracted services
rendered from another government agency while receiving payment from the Division of Marine
Fisheries for services during the same time period (June 30, 1992)." Based upon this allegation, it
appears that the Petitioner is being accused of performing all of the alleged acts on June 30, 1992.
13. There is no evidence that the Petitioner signed a contract, requested payment, or performed any
services for another government agency on June 30, 1992. There is evidence that SCC issued the
Petitioner a check on June 30, 1992. But there is no evidence that the check was issued for services
rendered to SCC on June 30, 1992 while the Petitioner was receiving payment from the DMF during
the same time period.
14. Regarding the issue of defraudment, the termination letter lacks the requisite specificity in that the
evidence does not support any allegation that the acts alleged occurred on June 30, 1992.
15. Furthermore, if one assumes that the gist of the Respondent's complaint is that the Petitioner was
defrauding the State by arranging to receive double payment for the same duties, it would be
necessary for the Respondent to prove that the Petitioner actually benefited monetarily. The
Respondent, however, terminated the Petitioner's employment before he ever received the check
which represented payment by SCC for the courses the Petitioner taught during the Respondent's
Spring In-Service Training. The Petitioner testified that he intended to turn the check over to the
Respondent, as one would do with jury duty pay, when he received it. The Respondent did not offer
339 9:5 NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER June 1, 1994
CONTESTED CASE DECISIONS
any evidence that refutes the Petitioner's contention other than the feet that the Petitioner never
informed the Respondent of his intention to turn the check over to it even when he informed Director
Hogarth that he had not received the check.
16. An act of defraudment essentially involves depriving a person of property by deceit or artifice.
Black's Law Dictionary , 381 (5th ed. 1979).
17. The acts of signing a contract, requesting payment and being issued a check do not, by themselves,
either individually or collectively constitute an act or acts of fraud since none of those acts either
individually or collectively necessarily result in a person being deprived of property by deceit or
artifice.
18. The defraudment alleged in the discharge letter states that the defraudment occurred on "June 30,
1992".
19. No defraudment of Respondent by Petitioner occurred on June 30, 1992.
20. The second allegation presumably refers to whether Petitioner could legitimately work a "split shift"
on July 18, 1992.
21. Even if the second allegation in the termination letter were, arguendo, sufficiently precise to meet the
specificity requirements of North Carolina General Statutes section 126-35, the second allegation
(concerning the alleged failure to follow written and verbal instructions from Petitioner's immediate
supervisor, Mr. Hardison, on July 18, 1992) is not a sufficient basis to dismiss a permanent or career
state employee for just cause on the basis of personal misconduct.
22. Petitioner testified that his working a "split shift" (which meant working the tides early morning and
late afternoon) as he deemed appropriate had, he thought, been verbally approved by Mr. Hardison,
acting supervisor, on July 16, 1992.
23. Mr. Hardison testified that he did not give Petitioner permission to work a "split shift" on July 18,
1992. The words spoken by Mr. Hardison could, however, reasonably have been interpreted to grant
the Petitioner permission to work whatever hours were necessary to cover his complaints. That could
have meant working from 10:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m. plus additional overtime hours to cover the
early morning complaints or it could have meant working a "split shift" to cover the complaints.
24. Confusion, in retrospect, about what the Petitioner was authorized to do, is not insubordination and
does not constitute the type of conduct that would justify a dismissal without prior warning.
25. Respondent did not have just cause to dismiss Petitioner for the second allegation in the termination
letter even if the second allegation had met the specificity requirement of North Carolina General
Statutes section 126-35.
26. The third allegation presumably refers to a directive issued from Mr. Fentress H. Munden, Deputy
Director of the Division of Marine Fisheries, dated July 21, 1992 to Petitioner which places Petitioner
under investigatory suspension and instructs Petitioner, among other things, not to "have any
conversations with any other employees outside of [his] chain of command in this Division regarding
this matter."
27. Even if the third allegation of misconduct in the termination letter were sufficiently precise to meet
the specificity requirements of North Carolina General Statutes section 126-35, the third allegation
(even if proven true) could not be a sufficient basis for a just cause dismissal of a permanent or career
state employee. An employee who is under investigatory suspension is entitled to gather whatever
legitimate evidence he can gather in his defense during a period of suspension when the agency is
itself gathering evidence regarding the suspension. A delay in gathering evidence can result in the
9:5 NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER June 1, 1994 340
CONTESTED CASE DECISIONS
evidence being lost, dissipated or evaporated with the passage of time blunting an otherwise sharp
memory into a stale memory. Elementary due process requires a level playing field.
28. Respondent tailed to meet its burden of proving it terminated Petitioner for just cause within the
meaning of the State Personnel Act.
29. The Petitioner is entitled to reinstatement, backpay from the date of his suspension without pay,
including all legislative pay increases, minus any pay from other employment he received during the
period of his suspension and discharge from the Respondent's employ, all attendant benefits of
continuous state employment and attorneys fees.
RECOMMENDED DECISION
The State Personnel Commission will make the Final Decision in this contested case. It is
recommended that the Commission adopt the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law set forth above and
rule that the Petitioner is entitled to be reinstated with full back pay and all attendant benefits of continuous
employment with the State of North Carolina from the date of his termination until the date of his
reinstatement. Attorney fees and costs should also be awarded to the Petitioner. In addition, his personnel
file should be appropriately rectified so as to reflect that he was discharged without substantive just cause.
Any and all documents in his personnel file which indicate to any degree a contrary fact should be removed
Any pay which Petitioner received during the period of his suspension and discharge should be deducted from
his backpay award.
ORDER
It is hereby ordered that the agency serve a copy of the Final Decision on the Office of Administrative
Hearings, P.O. Drawer 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447, in accordance with North Carolina General
Statutes section 150B-36(b).
NOTICE
Before the State Personnel Commission makes the FINAL DECISION, it is required by North
Carolina General Statutes section 150B-36(a) to give each party an opportunity to file exceptions to this
RECOMMENDED DECISION, and to present written arguments to those in the agency who will make the
final decision.
The agency is required by North Carolina General Statutes section 150B-36(b)to serve a copy of the
Final Decision on all parties and to furnish a copy to the Parties' attorney of record.
This the 4th day of May, 1994.
Brenda B. Becton
Administrative Law Judge
341 9:5 NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER June 1, 1994
CONTESTED CASE DECISIONS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE OFFICE OF
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
COUNTY OF ORANGE 93 OSP 0925
ERIC W. BROWNING,
Petitioner,
UNC-CHAPEL HILL,
Respondent
RECOMMENDED DECISION
This matter came on for hearing before Fred G. Morrison Jr., Senior Administrative Law Judge,
Office of Administrative Hearings, on January 27 and 28, 1994, in Raleigh, North Carolina. Following the
hearing, the parties submitted proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. A transcript of the hearing
was filed on April 15, 1994.
APPEARANCES
FOR THE PETITIONER: Attorney Alan McSurely
FOR THE RESPONDENT: Assistant Attorney General David Parker
1 . Did Respondent discriminate against Petitioner because of his race when it discharged him?
2. Did Respondent retaliate against Petitioner when it discharged him, because he had protested alleged
racial discrimination involving promotional and training opportunities, failure to give him written
notice as to why he was denied certain promotions and training opportunities, and failure to provide
him with adequate and accurate information about training opportunities?
3. Did Respondent have just cause, procedurally and substantively, to terminate Petitioner's
employment?
OPINION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
Based on competent evidence admitted at the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge makes the
following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Mr. Eric Wayne Browning, Petitioner, was employed by Respondent at the Carolina Inn making
salads and desserts on February 8, 1989, as a Food Service Assistant 1; on May 8, 1989, he
transferred to a Housekeeper position, Pay Grade 50, in the Physical Plant Department where he
worked, with no grade increase, until he was dismissed, effective May 7, 1993. Petitioner has
appealed this dismissal.
2. Petitioner is a Black male, married, and the father of five young children. He graduated from high
school and attended Johnson C. Smith University for two years.
9:5 NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER June 1, 1994 342
CONTESTED CASE DECISIONS
3. His working hours with Respondent were from 3:50 AM until 11:50 AM with two short breaks.
Since his hourly pay with Respondent (about $6.00) was not sufficient to meet family needs,
Petitioner worked a second job at a local restaurant.
4. During his exactly four years as a Housekeeper, Petitioner applied for thirteen promotions and many
training opportunities. He was not given any promotions and only attended one training program
given to all Housekeepers.
5. Respondent did not always follow its policy of notifying applicants such as Petitioner of promotional
decisions with reasons. This was very frustrating to Petitioner in his efforts to better himself.
6. During his four years as a Housekeeper, Petitioner did a good job, received positive evaluations, and
was encouraged to seek promotions.
7. Petitioner had attempted for 11/2 years to enroll in a Supervisory Resources training course with the
hope that this would enable him to get a promotion.
8. Respondent frustrated Petitioner in this training quest by means of conflicting information, mis-
information, and lack of substantive communication.
9. During his employment, Petitioner was actively involved with about 300 other Housekeepers in
seeking better pay, supervision, training and promotional opportunities. Rev. Jesse Jackson visited
Chapel Hill in early 1993 to promote their efforts. Petitioner and others appeared with Rev. Jackson
in a news photograph following this visit.
10. In the fall of 1992, Petitioner filed a grievance concerning not being interviewed for a position he
applied for. A pre-hearing conference on this matter was scheduled for April 28, 1993, at 2:00 PM,
before Professor Robert Joyce of the Institute of Government. Housekeeping Superintendent Hardy
White, Black male, was management's representative for this conference.
1 1 . William Burston, Black male, served as Respondent's Training Manager. He had attempted to get
Petitioner admitted to the Supervisory Resources training course, but Hardy White had decided that
a preparatory course for all housekeepers was a pre-requisite. This was a new requirement added by
White after Petitioner had been seeking admission for more than a year.
12. Petitioner had successfully grieved an oral warning which Respondent failed to remove from his file.
White had stated to Petitioner's supervisor that he was going to transfer Petitioner following this
grievance.
13. Petitioner decided to grieve White's denial of his training request. He called Gwen Gardner at
Counseling and went to her office for forms on April 28, 1993, around 8:30 AM.
14. While at Counseling, Petitioner talked with Karen Boulding about the training request. Ms. Boulding
called Mr. Burston who told her that Mr. White would not approve this training until the general
course was completed. He had recently talked with Petitioner.
15. Hearing this conversation, Petitioner lost his temper. He stormed away, but returned shortly. He
called White a bastard, said White made him sick, and stated "I ought to get my gun and kill the son-
of-a-bitch." Petitioner had no gun with him at this time.
343 9:5 NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER June 1, 1994
CONTESTED CASE DECISIONS
16. Petitioner proceeded to Gwen Gardner's office and continued his tirade before her. While speaking
derogatorily and vociferously about the university, Petitioner was waving his hands in her face. He
seemed to her to be speaking to someone else. While he did not threaten Ms. Gardner, his unusual
behavior did frighten her somewhat. Petitioner threw his notebook and papers against the wall and
left. Ms. Gardner called the campus police.
17. Ms. Boulding called Mr. Burston who came to the offices and found Petitioner weeping and
complaining about the denial of his training request. Mr. Burston succeeded in calming Petitioner
down.
18. The campus police arrived after Petitioner had left the scene. They investigated the matter and got
written statements from Boulding, Gardner and Burston. No criminal charges have been filed in this
matter.
19. The Petitioner attended the pre-hearing conference before Professor Joyce at 2:00 PM on this same
day (April 28). He had a very calm and pleasant demeanor. He related very well with Hardy White
who also attended. He apologized for the statements he had made that morning to Boulding and
Gardner.
20. Professor Joyce agreed to consolidate the Petitioner's grievance about being denied training with the
one pending. The Petitioner filed this second grievance on the morning of April 29, 1993.
21. After receiving and reviewing the police reports concerning the April 28th altercation, Respondent's
Director of Physical Plant, Herbert Paul, had Petitioner suspended effective April 30, 1993. A pre-
dismissal conference was conducted on May 3rd following which Petitioner was notified by letter that
his employment was terminated effective May 7th because of his personal conduct before Ms.
Gardner and Ms. Boulding on April 28th.
22. Paul is White. Gardner, Boulding, White and Burston are Black. Paul testified that Petitioner was
not fired because of his race or in retaliation for protesting discriminatory actions. Ms. Boulding is
trained in working with emotionally disturbed people and Gardner is licensed to practice law.
23. Following the dismissal of Petitioner, Ms. Boulding's superior contacted Professor Joyce to inform
him of the firing and offer his opinion that Petitioner's two pending grievances were mooted. Mr.
Maynard was to check with Respondent's counsel and get back to Joyce. There were no written
communications from counsel to Maynard regarding these matters. Professor Joyce was not on the
panel hearing Petitioner's grievance concerning dismissal.
Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact, the Administrative Law Judge makes the following:
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1 . Mr. Eric W. Browning, Petitioner, was a permanent State employee with the Respondent at the time
of his being dismissed. Because Petitioner has alleged lack of just cause, illegal discrimination and
retaliation because of his race and protests as the basis for his dismissal, the Office of Administrative
Hearings has jurisdiction to hear the matter and submit a recommendation to the State Personnel
Commission which shall make a final decision in the matter. North Carolina General Statutes 126-16,
126-35, 126-36, 126-37, 126-39 and 150B-23 et seg.
2. Where illegal discrimination or retaliation is an issue, Petitioner bears the ultimate burden of proof
and must establish a prima facie case of discrimination by providing sufficient facts in order to raise
an inference of discrimination. The Petitioner has not established a prima facie case of discrimination
or retaliation because of his race.
9:5 NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER June 1, 1994 344
CONTESTED CASE DECISIONS
3 . While Respondent has shown just cause to discipline Petitioner, it is concluded that fair administering
of discipline includes mitigating the treatment in this case because of Petitioner's good work record
as well as the Respondent's actions which contributed to his frustrations and ventilation of same.
Furthermore, it was not fair to treat Petitioner's pending grievances as moot since they were part of
his frustrations. Fairness would have been to let Professor Joyce hear all three combined. Under 25
NCAC IB .0413 it is provided that "the State Personnel Commission will weigh all relevant factors
and circumstances in employee grievance appeals, including factors of mitigation and justification,
in making a determination of whether disciplinary action was imposed for just cause. " Weighing and
balancing the equities in this case leads me to the conclusion that a less severe sanction was
warranted. This is not to excuse Petitioner's diatribe, but is an empathetic way to deal with the plight
of one of the lowest paid state employees who lost his temper during a stressful period. UNC policy
also allows such mitigation.
Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions, the Administrative Law Judge makes the
following:
RECOMMENDED DECISION
That the Respondent's decision be reversed and the Petitioner be reinstated with attorney's fees, and
a final written warning for improper personal conduct.
ORDER
It is hereby ordered that the agency serve a copy of the final decision on the Office of Administrative
Hearings, P.O. Drawer 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447, in accordance with North Carolina General Statute
150B-36(b).
NOTICE
The agency making the final decision in this contested case is required to give each party an
opportunity to file exceptions to this recommended decision and to present written arguments to those in the
agency who will make the final decision. G.S. 150B-36(a).
The agency is required by G.S. 150B-36(b) to serve a copy of the final decision on all parties and to
furnish a copy to the parties' attorney of record and to the Office of Administrative Hearings.
The agency that will make the final decision in this contested case is the State Personnel Commission.
This the 3rd day of May, 1994.
Fred G. Morrison Jr.
Senior Administrative Law Judge
345 9:5 NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER June 1, 1994
NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
The North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC) has four major subdivisions of rules. Two of these,
titles and chapters, are mandatory. The major subdivision of the NCAC is the title. Each major
department in the North Carolina executive branch of government has been assigned a title number.
Titles are further broken down into chapters which shall be numerical in order. The other two,
subchapters and sections are optional subdivisions to be used by agencies when appropriate.
TITLE/MAJOR DIVISIONS OF THE NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
TITLE DEPARTMENT LICENSING BOARDS CHAPTER
1
Administration
Acupuncture
1
2
Agriculture
Architecture
2
3
Auditor
Auctioneeis
4
4
Commerce
Barber Examiners
6
5
Correction
Certified Public Accountant Examiners
8
6
Council of State
Chiropractic Examiners
10
7
Cultural Resources
General Contractors
12
8
Elections
Cosmetic Art Examiners
14
9
Governor
Dental Examiners
16
10
Human Resources
Dietetics/Nutrition
17
11
Insurance
Electrical Contractors
18
12
Justice
Electrolysis
19
13
Labor
Foresters
20
14A
Crime Control & Public Safety
Geologists
21
15A
Environment, Health, and Natural
Hearing Aid Dealers and Fitters
22
Resources
Landscape Architects
26
16
Public Education
Landscape Contractors
28
17
Revenue
Marital and Family Therapy
31
18
Secretary of State
Medical Examiners
32
19A
Transportation
Midwifery Joint Committee
33
20
Treasurer
Mortuary Science
34
*21
Occupational Licensing Boards
Nursing
36
22
Administrative Procedures
Nursing Home Administrators
37
23
Community Colleges
Occupational Therapists
38
24
Independent Agencies
Opticians
40
25
State Personnel
Optometry
42
26
Administrative Hearings
Osteopathic Examination & Reg. (Repealed)
44
Pharmacy
46
Physical Therapy Examiners
48
Plumbing, Heating & Fire Sprinkler Contractors
50
Podiatry Examiners
52
Professional Counselors
53
Practicing Psychologists
54
Professional Engineers & Land Surveyors
56
Real Estate Appraisal Board
57
Real Estate Commission
58
Refrigeration Examiners
60
Sanitarian Examiners
62
Social Work Certification
63
Speech & Language Pathologists & Audiologists
64
Therapeutic Recreation Certification
65
Veterinary Medical Board
66
Note: Title 21 contains the chapters of the various occupational licensing boards.
9:5
NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER
June 1, 1994
346
CUMULATIVE INDEX
CUMULATIVE INDEX
(April 1994 - March 1995)
Pages Issue
1 - 75 1 - April
76 - 122 2 - April
123 - 226 , 3 - May
227 - 305 4 - May
306 - 348 5 - June
Unless otherwise identified, page references in this Index are to proposed rules.
AGRICULTURE
Plant Industry, 127
COMMERCE
Energy Division, 4
CRIME CONTROL AND PUBLIC SAFETY
State Highway Patrol, Division of, 243
ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DEM/ Air Quality, 80
Departmental Rules, 254
Environmental Management, 81, 258
Health Services, 323
NPDES Permit, 3, 232
Solid Waste Management, 171
Water Resources, 165, 255
Wildlife Resources Commission, 38, 42, 84
Wildlife Resources Commission Proclamation, 125
FINAL DECISION LETTERS
Voting Rights Act, 2, 312
GOVERNOR/LT. GOVERNOR
Executive Orders, 1, 123, 227, 306
HUMAN RESOURCES
Child Day Care Commission, 10
Children's Services, 136
Day Care Rules, 148
Facility Services, 4, 128
Medical Assistance, 318
Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities and Substance Abuse Services, 13, 24, 36, 313
Social Services, 136
INDEPENDENT AGENCDZS
State Health Plan Purchasing Alliance Board, 99
347 9:5 NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER June 1, 1994
CUMULATIVE INDEX
INSURANCE
Multiple Employer Welfare Arrangements, 76
Special Services Division, 76
JUSTICE
Criminal Justice Education and Training Standards Commission, 149
State Bureau of Investigation, 234
LABOR
Mine and Quarry Division, 239
OSHA, 77, 160
Variance, 230
LICENSING BOARDS
Acupuncture Licensing Board, 44
Cosmetic Art Examiners, 280
Landscape Architects, Board of, 95
Medical Examiners, 192
Nursing, Board of, 45
Optometry, Board of Examiners, 194
Plumbing, Heating and Fire Sprinkler Contractors, Board of, 96
Practicing Psychologists, Board of, 97
Professional Counselors, Board of Licensed, 50
LIST OF RULES CODIFIED
List of Rules Codified, 53, 196, 281
TRANSPORTATION
Highways, Division of, 85
Motor Vehicles, Division of, 89, 276
9:5 NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER June 1, 1994 348
NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
The full publication consists of 53 volumes, totaling in excess of 1 5 ,000 pages. It is supplemented monthly
with replacement pages. A one year subscription to the full publication including supplements can be
purchased for seven hundred and fifty dollars ($750. 00). Individual volumes may also be purchased with
supplement service. Renewal subscriptions for supplements to the initial publication are available at one-half
the new subscription price.
Volume
Title
PRICE LIST FOR THE SUBSCRIPTION YEAR
New Total
Chapter Subject Subscription* Quantity Price
1 -53
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
Full Code
1
2
2
3
4
4
5
5
6
7
8
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
11
12
13
13
13
14A
15A
15A
15A
15A
15A
1 -38
1 -24
25-52
1 -4
1 -2
3 -20
1 -2
3 -4
1 -4
1 - 12
1 -9
1 -4
I -2
3A- 3K
3L- 3R
3S- 3W
4-6
7
8-9
10
II - 14
15 - 17
18
19-30
31 -33
34-41
42
43 -51
1 - 19
1 - 12
1 -6
7
8 - 16
1 - 11
1 -2
3 -6
7
8 -9
10
All titles
Administration
Agriculture
Agriculture
Auditor
Commerce (includes AB
Commerce
Correction
Correction
Council of State
Cultural Resources
Elections
Governor/Lt. Governor
Human Resources
Human Resources
Human Resources
(includes CON)
Human Resources
Human Resources
Human Resources
Human Resources
Human Resources
Human Resources
Human Resources
Human Resources
Human Resources
Human Resources
Human Resources
Human Resources
Human Resources
Insurance
Justice
Labor
OSHA
Labor
Crime Control and
Public Safety
EHNR (includes EMC)
EHNR
Coastal Management
EHNR
Wildlife
$750.00
90.00
75.00
75.00
10.00
Z) 45.00
90.00
60.00
30.00
60.00
10.00
45.00
30.00
90.00
45.00
30.00
30.00
30.00
30.00
30.00
60.00
45.00
75.00
90.00
30.00
60.00
45.00
90.00
90.00
90.00
30.00
45.00
45.00
45.00
90.00
45.00
45.00
30.00
45.00
Volume
Title
Chapter
New
Subject Subscription*
Quantity
Total
Price
39
15A
15A
16
17
17
18
19A
20
21
21
21
22
23
24
25
26
11-18 EHNR 90.00
19 - 26 EHNR
(includes Breathalizer) 75.00
1 - 6 Education 30.00
1 - 6 Revenue 75.00
7-11 Revenue 60.00
1 - 8 Secretary of State 30.00
1 - 6 Transportation 90.00
1 - 9 Treasurer 45.00
1-16 Licensing Boards 75.00
17-37 Licensing Boards 75.00
38 - 70 Licensing Boards
1 - 2 Administrative Procedures 75.00
1-3 Community Colleges 10.00
1-3 Independent Agencies 10.00
1 State Personnel 60.00
1 - 4 Administrative Hearings 10.00
Subtotal
(North Carolina subscribers add 6% sales tax)
Total
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
{
(Make checks payable to Office of Administrative Hearings.)
This price includes the title in its current form plus supplementation for the subscription year.
MAIL TO:
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
POST OFFICE DRAWER 27447
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27611-7447
REVISED 09/93
H
LS
U
FOLD HERE
NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER
ORDER FORM
Please enter my subscription for the North Carolina Register to start with the issue.
($105.00/year subscription. N.C. subscribers please add sales tax.)
Renew North Carolina Register
Check Enclosed Q Please bill me
se make checks payable to Office of Administrative Hearings
VIE ADDRESS
Y , STATE ZIP
)NE
urn to Office of Administrative Hearings - fold at line, staple at bottom and affix postage.)
CHANGE OF ADDRESS
1. Present Address
NAME
ADDRESS
CITY
STATE
ZIP
2. New Address
NAME
ADDRESS
CITY
STATE
ZIP
Office of Administrative Hearings
P.O. Drawer 27447
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7447
FIRST CLASS MAIL
US F
:
;
I
585
UHIV. OF NORTH CAROLINA
LAW LIBRARY CBR 3335
VAN HECKE-UETTACH 064-A
CHAPEL HILL
; Z7599